Adjuvant dose-dense chemotherapy in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

被引:0
作者
Fausto Petrelli
Mary Cabiddu
Andrea Coinu
Karen Borgonovo
Mara Ghilardi
Veronica Lonati
Sandro Barni
机构
[1] Azienda Ospedaliera Treviglio,Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology
来源
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | 2015年 / 151卷
关键词
Adjuvant chemotherapy; Breast cancer; Dose dense; Overall survival; Meta-analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Dose-dense (DD) chemotherapy (CT) aimed at achieving a higher rate of cancer cell destruction has been adopted as an adjuvant therapy in high-risk breast cancer (BC), with the goal being to improve outcomes. We performed an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing data from randomized phase III trials regarding the efficacy and toxicity of this adjuvant DD-CT strategy in early BC. Randomized-controlled trials that compared a DD with a standard adjuvant CT schedule in adult women with resected BC were identified by searching the databases of Pubmed, the Cochrane Cancer Register of Controlled Trials, SCOPUS, EMBASE, and the Web of Science up to March 2015. Hazard ratios (HRs) of death and recurrence, and the relative risks of adverse events, were estimated and pooled. A total of 8 phase III trials encompassing 17,188 randomized patients met the inclusion criteria. The patients who received DD-CT had better overall survival (OS: HR 0.86, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.79–0.93, P = 0.0001) and disease-free survival (DFS: HR 0.84, 95 % CI 0.77–0.91, P < 0.0001) than those on the conventional schedule. A statistically significant OS benefit was observed in patients with hormone receptor-negative (ER−) tumors (HR 0.8, P = 0.002), but not in those with ER-positive BC (HR 0.93, 95 % CI 0.82–1.05; P = 0.25). DD-CT leads to better OS and DFS, particularly in women with ER− early BC. These results suggest that the DD strategy should be the standard care offered to high-risk ER− BC patients.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 259
页数:8
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [1] Peto R(2012)Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100,000 women in 123 randomised trials Lancet 379 432-444
  • [2] Davies C(2005)Conceptual and practical implications of breast tissue geometry: toward a more effective, less toxic therapy Oncologist 10 370-381
  • [3] Norton L(2003)Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: first report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741 J Clin Oncol 21 1431-1439
  • [4] Citron ML(2010)Dose-dense chemotherapy in nonmetastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials J Natl Cancer Inst 102 1845-1854
  • [5] Berry DA(2015)Fluorouracil and dose-dense chemotherapy in adjuvant treatment of patients with early-stage breast cancer: an open-label, 2  ×  2 factorial, randomised phase 3 trial Lancet 31 3197-3204
  • [6] Cirrincione C(2013)Definitive results of a phase III adjuvant trial comparing three chemotherapy regimens in women with operable, node-positive breast cancer: the NSABP B-38 trial J Clin Oncol 132 609-619
  • [7] Bonilla L(2012)Postoperative dose-dense sequential versus concomitant administration of epirubicin and paclitaxel in patients with node-positive breast cancer: 5-year results of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group HE 10/00 phase III Trial Breast Cancer Res Treat 17 2815-2834
  • [8] Ben-Aharon I(1998)Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints Stat Med 22 719-748
  • [9] Vidal L(1959)Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease J Natl Cancer Inst 7 177-188
  • [10] Del Mastro L(1986)Meta-analysis in clinical trials Control Clin Trials 315 629-634