Decentralization with porous borders: public production in a federation with tax competition and spillovers

被引:0
作者
Stephanie Armbruster
Beat Hintermann
机构
[1] Faculty of Business and Economics,
[2] University of Basel,undefined
来源
International Tax and Public Finance | 2020年 / 27卷
关键词
Fiscal federalism; Tax competition; Externalities; Spillovers; Commitment; Centralized leadership; Decentralized leadership; H21; H40; H77; Q58;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We analyze the strategic interaction of regional and federal governments using a model that includes fiscal externalities in the form of inter-regional capital tax competition and technical externalities in the form of inter-regional spillovers. The federal government aims to correct for these inefficiencies using a transfer system. If the regional governments are policy leaders (such that federal policy is set conditional on regional choices), they will internalize both fiscal and technical externalities but free-ride on the transfer system. Efficiency can be achieved by introducing a second transfer scheme that is independent of regional public production. If the federal government sets its policy first and can commit itself to it, the outcome is efficient only if matching grants are used that are financed outside of the transfer system.
引用
收藏
页码:606 / 642
页数:36
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]  
Akai N(2008)Too big or too small? A synthetic view of the commitment problem of interregional transfers Journal of Urban Economics 64 551-559
[2]  
Sato M(2005)Why countries are fiscally decentralizing Journal of Public Economics 89 1157-1189
[3]  
Arzaghi M(2012)Even small trade costs restore efficiency in tax competition Journal of Urban Economics 72 191-195
[4]  
Henderson JV(2002)Tax competition and international public goods International Tax and Public Finance 9 111-120
[5]  
Becker J(2007)The effect of spillovers on the provision of local public goods Review of Economic Design 11 199-216
[6]  
Runkel M(2015)Oates’ decentralization theorem with imperfect household mobility International Tax and Public Finance 22 353-375
[7]  
Bjorvatn K(2004)The theory and practice of equalization CESifo Economic Studies 50 211-254
[8]  
Schjelderup G(2012)Reassessment of the Tiebout model Journal of Public Economics 96 1063-1078
[9]  
Bloch F(2010)Gross versus net equalization scheme in a federation with decentralized leadership Journal of Urban Economics 68 205-214
[10]  
Zenginobuz U(1991)Asymmetric tax competition Journal of Urban Economics 30 167-181