Spatial resilience: integrating landscape ecology, resilience, and sustainability

被引:0
作者
Graeme S. Cumming
机构
[1] University of Cape Town,Percy FitzPatrick Institute, DST/NRF Centre of Excellence
来源
Landscape Ecology | 2011年 / 26卷
关键词
Resilience; Spatial resilience; Complexity; Landscape ecology; Framework; Social–ecological system; Vulnerability; Robustness; Social exclusion; Fragmentation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Landscape ecology has a high potential to contribute to sustainability in the interactions of people and nature. Landscape ecologists have already made considerable progress towards a more general understanding of the relevance of spatial variation for ecosystems. Incorporating the complexities of societies and economies into landscape ecology analyses will, however, require a broader framework for thinking about spatial elements of complexity. An exciting recent development is to explicitly try to integrate landscape ecology and ideas about resilience in social–ecological systems through the concept of spatial resilience. Spatial resilience focuses on the importance of location, connectivity, and context for resilience, based on the idea that spatial variation in patterns and processes at different scales both impacts and is impacted by local system resilience. I first introduce and define the concepts of resilience and spatial resilience and then discuss some of their potential contributions to the further interdisciplinary integration of landscape ecology, complexity theory, and sustainability science. Complexity theorists have argued that many complex phenomena, such as symmetry-breaking and selection, share common underlying mechanisms regardless of system type (physical, social, ecological, or economic). Similarities in the consequences of social exclusion and habitat fragmentation provide an informative example. There are many strong parallels between pattern–process interactions in social and ecological systems, respectively, and a number of general spatial principles and mechanisms are emerging that have relevance across many different kinds of system. Landscape ecologists, with their background in spatially explicit pattern–process analysis, are well placed to contribute to this emerging research agenda.
引用
收藏
页码:899 / 909
页数:10
相关论文
共 194 条
[1]  
Abbott A(1997)Of time and space: the contemporary relevance of the Chicago school Soc Forces 75 1149-1182
[2]  
Acemoglu D(1997)Asymmetric business cycles: theory and time-series evidence J Monet Econ 40 501-533
[3]  
Scott A(2003)Future directions in residential segregation and health research: a multilevel approach Am J Public Health 93 215-221
[4]  
Acevedo-Garcia D(2004)A framework to analyze the robustness of social-ecological systems from an institutional perspective Ecol Soc 9 18-473
[5]  
Lochner KA(2003)Environmental ‘loopholes’ and fish population dynamics: comparative pattern recognition with focus on El Nino effects in the Pacific Fish Oceanogr 12 458-346
[6]  
Osypuk TL(2005)Heterogeneous firms, agglomeration and economic geography: spatial selection and sorting J Econ Geogr 6 323-1925
[7]  
Subramanian SV(1998)Habitat fragmentation, percolation theory and the conservation of a keystone species Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 265 1921-171
[8]  
Anderies JM(2000)Urban sprawl: diagnosis and remedies Int Reg Sci Rev 23 160-1389
[9]  
Janssen MA(2003)Size does matter—effects of tropical rainforest fragmentation on the leaf litter ant community in Sabah, Malaysia Biodivers Conserv 12 1371-781
[10]  
Ostrom E(2001)From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what? Ecosystems 4 765-244