Trochanteric fractures treated with a proximal femoral nail

被引:0
作者
Domingo L.J. [1 ,3 ]
Cecilia D. [2 ]
Herrera A. [1 ]
Resines C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology Service, 'Miguel Servet' University Hospital, Zaragosa
[2] Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology Service, �12 de Octubre� University Hospital, Madrid
[3] 50009 Zaragoza, C/ Men�ndez Pidal, no. 3
关键词
Trochanteric Fracture; Intertrochanteric Fracture; Gamma Nail; Cefonicid; Proximal Femoral Nail;
D O I
10.1007/s002640100275
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We followed prospectively 295 patients with trochanteric fractures treated with the proximal femoral nail. The average age of the patients was 80 years and three out of four were female. The most frequent fracture type was A2 (59%). Clinical and radiographic controls were performed at 1, 3 and 6 months. There were technical complications during the operation in 12% of the cases, complications in the immediate postoperative period in 27% and late complications were detected in 4% of patients. Previous walking ability was recovered by 71%. The surgical technique is not complex, the number of complications recorded was acceptable and the overall results obtained are comparable with other fracture systems.
引用
收藏
页码:298 / 301
页数:3
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Bridle S.H., Patel A.D., Bircher M., Calvert P.T., Fixation of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. A randomised prospective comparison of the gamma nail and the dynamic hip screw, J Bone Joint Surg [Br], 73, pp. 330-334, (1991)
  • [2] Calvert P.T., The gamma nail: A significant advance or a passing fashion?, J Bone Joint Surg [Br], 74, pp. 329-331, (1992)
  • [3] Carrillo F.J., Pinero A., Jimenez A., Vega A., Perez J.E., Complicaciones técnicas del clavo gamma. Tratamiento y prevención, Rev Ortop Traumatol, 41, pp. 2-8, (1997)
  • [4] Ferrer M., Casteleiro R., Matas J.A., Tratamiento de las fracturas de la región trocantérea con clavo gamma. Revisión de 116 casos, Rev Ortop Traumatol, 39, pp. 99-103, (1995)
  • [5] Halder S.C., The gamma nail for peritrochanteric fractures, J Bone Joint Surg [Br], 74, pp. 340-344, (1992)
  • [6] Landolt M., Comparison and presentation of technique and results of the gamma nail and dynamic hip screw, Helv Chir Acta, 59, pp. 965-969, (1993)
  • [7] Leung K.S., So W.S., Shen W.Y., Hui P.Q., Gamma nails and dynamic hip screw for peritrochanteric fractures: A randomised prospective study in elderly patients, J Bone Joint Surg [Br], 74, pp. 345-351, (1992)
  • [8] Muller M.E., Nazarian S., Koch P., Classification AO des Fracturens, (1987)
  • [9] Parker M.J., Pryor G.A., Gamma nail versus DHS nailing for extracapsular femoral fractures. Meta-analysis of ten randomised trials, Int Orthop, 20, pp. 163-168, (1996)
  • [10] Radford P.J., Needoff M., Webb J.K., A prospective randomised comparison of the dynamic hip screw and the gamma locking nail, J Bone Joint Surg [Br], 75, pp. 789-793, (1993)