Decision Making Under Objective Risk Conditions–a Review of Cognitive and Emotional Correlates, Strategies, Feedback Processing, and External Influences

被引:0
作者
Johannes Schiebener
Matthias Brand
机构
[1] University of Duisburg-Essen,Department of General Psychology: Cognition
[2] Erwin L. Hahn Institute for Magnetic Resonance Imaging,undefined
来源
Neuropsychology Review | 2015年 / 25卷
关键词
Decision making; Objective risk; Dual process model; Reflective impulsive system; Sociodemographic factors; External influences;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
While making decisions under objective risk conditions, the probabilities of the consequences of the available options are either provided or calculable. Brand et al. (Neural Networks 19:1266–1276, 2006) introduced a model describing the neuro-cognitive processes involved in such decisions. In this model, executive functions associated with activity in the fronto-striatal loop are important for developing and applying decision-making strategies, and for verifying, adapting, or revising strategies according to feedback. Emotional rewards and punishments learned from such feedback accompany these processes. In this literature review, we found support for the role of executive functions, but also found evidence for the importance of further cognitive abilities in decision making. Moreover, in addition to reflective processing (driven by cognition), decisions can be guided by impulsive processing (driven by anticipation of emotional reward and punishment). Reflective and impulsive processing may interact during decision making, affecting the evaluation of available options, as both processes are affected by feedback. Decision-making processes are furthermore modulated by individual attributes (e.g., age), and external influences (e.g., stressors). Accordingly, we suggest a revised model of decision making under objective risk conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 198
页数:27
相关论文
共 588 条
[31]  
Langenier MC(2006)Neuropsychological correlates of decision-making in ambiguous and risky situations Neural Networks 19 1266-1276
[32]  
Dauvilliers Y(2007)Neuropsychological correlates of decision making in patients with bulimia nervosa Neuropsychology 21 742-750
[33]  
Bechara A(2007)Role of the amygdala in decisions under ambiguity and decisions under risk: evidence from patients with Urbach-Wiethe disease Neuropsychologia 45 1305-1317
[34]  
Bechara A(2007)Decisions under ambiguity and decisions under risk: correlations with executive functions and comparisons of two different gambling tasks with implicit and explicit rules Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 29 86-99
[35]  
Bechara A(2008)The role of strategies in deciding advantageously in ambiguous and risky situations Cognitive Processing 9 159-173
[36]  
Damasio AR(2009)Decision making with and without feedback: the role of intelligence, strategies, executive functions, and cognitive styles Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 31 984-998
[37]  
Bechara A(2009)Do amnesic patients with Korsakoff’s syndrome use feedback when making decisions under risky conditions? An experimental investigation with the game of dice task with and without feedback Brain and Cognition 69 279-290
[38]  
Damasio AR(2014)Know the risk, take the win: how executive functions and probability processing influence advantageous decision making under risk conditions Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 36 914-929
[39]  
Damasio H(2012)Decision making under ambiguity but not under risk is related to problem gambling severity Psychiatry Research 200 568-574
[40]  
Anderson SW(2013)Iowa gambling task (IGT): twenty aears after - gambling disorder and IGT Frontiers in Psychology 4 665-383