Decision Making Under Objective Risk Conditions–a Review of Cognitive and Emotional Correlates, Strategies, Feedback Processing, and External Influences

被引:0
作者
Johannes Schiebener
Matthias Brand
机构
[1] University of Duisburg-Essen,Department of General Psychology: Cognition
[2] Erwin L. Hahn Institute for Magnetic Resonance Imaging,undefined
来源
Neuropsychology Review | 2015年 / 25卷
关键词
Decision making; Objective risk; Dual process model; Reflective impulsive system; Sociodemographic factors; External influences;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
While making decisions under objective risk conditions, the probabilities of the consequences of the available options are either provided or calculable. Brand et al. (Neural Networks 19:1266–1276, 2006) introduced a model describing the neuro-cognitive processes involved in such decisions. In this model, executive functions associated with activity in the fronto-striatal loop are important for developing and applying decision-making strategies, and for verifying, adapting, or revising strategies according to feedback. Emotional rewards and punishments learned from such feedback accompany these processes. In this literature review, we found support for the role of executive functions, but also found evidence for the importance of further cognitive abilities in decision making. Moreover, in addition to reflective processing (driven by cognition), decisions can be guided by impulsive processing (driven by anticipation of emotional reward and punishment). Reflective and impulsive processing may interact during decision making, affecting the evaluation of available options, as both processes are affected by feedback. Decision-making processes are furthermore modulated by individual attributes (e.g., age), and external influences (e.g., stressors). Accordingly, we suggest a revised model of decision making under objective risk conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 198
页数:27
相关论文
共 588 条
  • [1] Ackerman JP(2014)Risk-sensitive decision-making deficit in adolescent suicide attempters Journal of Child Adolescend Psychopharmacology 25 109-113
  • [2] McBee-Strayer SM(1994)Impaired recognition of emotion in facial expressions following bilateral damage to the human amygdala Nature 372 669-672
  • [3] Mendoza K(2006)Executive function and the frontal lobes: a meta-analytic review Neuropsychology Review 16 17-42
  • [4] Stevens J(2001)Lesions of the human amygdala impair enhanced perception of emotionally salient events Nature 411 305-309
  • [5] Sheftall AH(1991)Wisconsin card sorting test performance as a measure of frontal lobe damage Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 13 909-922
  • [6] Campo JV(2012)Knowing how much you don't know: a neural organization of uncertainty estimates Nature Reviews Neuroscience 13 572-586
  • [7] Adolphs R(2003)Working memory: looking back and looking forward Nature Reviews Neuroscience 4 829-839
  • [8] Tranel D(2012)Do (un)certainty appraisal tendencies reverse the influence of emotions on risk taking in sequential tasks? Cognition and Emotion 26 568-576
  • [9] Damasio H(2012)Context explains divergent effects of anger on risk taking Emotion 12 1196-1199
  • [10] Damasio A(2011)Do facets of self-reported impulsivity predict decision-making under ambiguity and risk? Evidence from a community sample Psychiatry Research 190 322-326