How Much Warming are We Committed to and How Much can be Avoided?

被引:1
|
作者
Bill Hare
Malte Meinshausen
机构
[1] Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK),Department of Environmental Sciences
[2] Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH Zurich),undefined
[3] Environmental Physics,undefined
[4] National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR),undefined
来源
Climatic Change | 2006年 / 75卷
关键词
Emission Scenario; Climate Policy; Climate Sensitivity; Geophysical Research Letter; Mitigation Scenario;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper examines different concepts of a ‘warming commitment’ which is often used in various ways to describe or imply that a certain level of warming is irrevocably committed to over time frames such as the next 50 to 100 years, or longer. We review and quantify four different concepts, namely (1) a ‘constant emission warming commitment’, (2) a ‘present forcing warming commitment’, (3) a‘zero emission (geophysical) warming commitment’ and (4) a ‘feasible scenario warming commitment’. While a ‘feasible scenario warming commitment’ is probably the most relevant one for policy making, it depends centrally on key assumptions as to the technical, economic and political feasibility of future greenhouse gas emission reductions. This issue is of direct policy relevance when one considers that the 2002 global mean temperatures were 0.8± 0.2 ∘C above the pre-industrial (1861–1890) mean and the European Union has a stated goal of limiting warming to 2 ∘C above the pre-industrial mean: What is the risk that we are committed to overshoot 2 ∘C? Using a simple climate model (MAGICC) for probabilistic computations based on the conventional IPCC uncertainty range for climate sensitivity (1.5 to 4.5 ∘C), we found that (1) a constant emission scenario is virtually certain to overshoot 2 ∘C with a central estimate of 2.0 ∘C by 2100 (4.2 ∘C by 2400). (2) For the present radiative forcing levels it seems unlikely that 2 ∘C are overshoot. (central warming estimate 1.1 ∘C by 2100 and 1.2 ∘C by 2400 with ∼10% probability of overshooting 2 ∘C). However, the risk of overshooting is increasing rapidly if radiative forcing is stabilized much above 400 ppm CO2 equivalence (1.95 W/m2) in the long-term. (3) From a geophysical point of view, if all human-induced emissions were ceased tomorrow, it seems ‘exceptionally unlikely’ that 2 ∘C will be overshoot (central estimate: 0.7 ∘C by 2100; 0.4 ∘C by 2400). (4) Assuming future emissions according to the lower end of published mitigation scenarios (350 ppm CO2eq to 450 ppm CO2eq) provides the central temperature projections are 1.5 to 2.1 ∘C by 2100 (1.5 to 2.0 ∘C by 2400) with a risk of overshooting 2 ∘C between 10 and 50% by 2100 and 1–32% in equilibrium. Furthermore, we quantify the ‘avoidable warming’ to be 0.16–0.26 ∘C for every 100 GtC of avoided CO2 emissions – based on a range of published mitigation scenarios.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 149
页数:38
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Who Should Pay How Much?
    Christopher Böhringer
    Thomas F. Rutherford
    Computational Economics, 2004, 23 (1) : 71 - 103
  • [2] How Much Human-Caused Global Warming Should We Expect with Business-As-Usual (BAU) Climate Policies? A Semi-Empirical Assessment
    Connolly, Ronan
    Connolly, Michael
    Carter, Robert M.
    Soon, Willie
    ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (06)
  • [3] The Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum: How much carbon is enough?
    Meissner, K. J.
    Bralower, T. J.
    Alexander, K.
    Dunkley Jones, T.
    Sijp, W.
    Ward, M.
    PALEOCEANOGRAPHY, 2014, 29 (10): : 946 - 963
  • [4] How much is United States greenhouse gas emissions certainty worth?
    Sanchez, Marla
    Matthews, Scott
    Fischbeck, Paul
    ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 51 : 259 - 263
  • [5] How Much Risk Ought We to Take? Exploring the Possibilities of Risk-Sensitive Consequentialism in the Context of Climate Engineering
    Stelzer, Harald
    Schuppert, Fabian
    ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES, 2016, 25 (01) : 69 - 90
  • [6] Delayed action and uncertain stabilisation targets. How much will the delay cost?
    Valentina Bosetti
    Carlo Carraro
    Alessandra Sgobbi
    Massimo Tavoni
    Climatic Change, 2009, 96 : 299 - 312
  • [7] Discounting the distant future: how much do uncertain rates increase valuations?
    Newell, RG
    Pizer, WA
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 46 (01) : 52 - 71
  • [8] Using the past to constrain the future: how the palaeorecord can improve estimates of global warming
    Edwards, Tamsin L.
    Crucifix, Michel
    Harrison, Sandy P.
    PROGRESS IN PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY-EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 31 (05): : 481 - 500
  • [9] Emergent Constraints on the Large-Scale Atmospheric Circulation and Regional Hydroclimate: Do They Still Work in CMIP6 and How Much Can They Actually Constrain the Future?
    Simpson, Isla R.
    McKinnon, Karen A.
    Davenport, Frances V.
    Tingley, Martin
    Lehner, Flavio
    Al Fahad, Abdullah
    Chen, Di
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2021, 34 (15) : 6355 - 6377
  • [10] 'We Need Communities of Color': How Coalitions Can Move from Climate Action to Climate Justice
    Lorenzen, Janet A. A.
    Drew, Emily
    SOCIAL JUSTICE RESEARCH, 2023, 36 (01) : 103 - 131