Freedom, preference and autonomy

被引:0
作者
Lehrer K. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Philosopy, University of Arizona, Tucson
[2] Institute for Philosophy, University of Graz
关键词
Action; Agency; Autonomy; Choice; Desire; Freedom; Higher order; Meta-mental; Preference; Responsibility;
D O I
10.1023/A:1009744817791
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Philosophers have advocated different kinds of freedom, but each has value and none should be neglected in a complete theory of freedom and responsibility. There are three kinds of freedom of preference and action that should be distinguished. A person S may fully prefer to do A at every level, and that is one kind of freedom. A person S may autonomously prefer to do A when S has the preference structure concerning doing A because S prefers to have that very preference structure, and that is a second kind of freedom. A person S may prefer to do A when S could have preferred otherwise, and that is a third kind of freedom. These forms of freedom may be combined, but they are valuable and essentially independent. They all involve the metamental ascendence of preference over desire, but it is autonomous preference that makes a person the author of his or her preference. The responsibility a person has for what he or she does out of a preference for doing it depends on the kinds of freedom of preference the person has and must be ranked in terms of them. © 1997 Kluwer Academic Publishers.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 25
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] CURRENT REFLECTIONS ON FREEDOM AND AUTONOMY: THE CONVERGENCE OF CAPACITY, RECIPROCITY AND RELATIONSHIP
    Monereo Atienza, Cristina
    DERECHOS Y LIBERTADES, 2018, (39) : 177 - 203
  • [32] From Relational Freedom to Autonomy: An Expansion of Verbeek's Postphenomenology
    Oie, Shinya
    HUMAN STUDIES, 2023, 46 (03) : 423 - 442
  • [33] Is the autonomy of the will a paradoxical idea?
    Bertea, Stefano
    SYNTHESE, 2023, 201 (04)
  • [34] Justice, autonomy and care: symposium on Asha Bhandary's freedom to care: liberalism, dependency care and justice
    Mullin, Amy
    CRITICAL REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL SOCIAL AND POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY, 2022, 25 (06) : 809 - 815
  • [35] Autonomy and false beliefs
    Killmister, Suzy
    PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 2013, 164 (02) : 513 - 531
  • [36] Autonomy, enactivism, and psychopathy
    Maiese, Michelle
    PHILOSOPHICAL EXPLORATIONS, 2022, 25 (01) : 19 - 41
  • [37] Autonomy in consumer choice
    Wertenbroch, Klaus
    Schrift, Rom Y.
    Alba, Joseph W.
    Barasch, Alixandra
    Bhattacharjee, Amit
    Giesler, Markus
    Knobe, Joshua
    Lehmann, Donald R.
    Matz, Sandra
    Nave, Gideon
    Parker, Jeffrey R.
    Puntoni, Stefano
    Zheng, Yanmei
    Zwebner, Yonat
    MARKETING LETTERS, 2020, 31 (04) : 429 - 439
  • [38] Is the autonomy of the will a paradoxical idea?
    Stefano Bertea
    Synthese, 201
  • [39] Autonomy and freedom of choice: A mixed methods analysis of the endorsement of SRHR and its core principles by global agencies
    Peters, Anny J. T. P.
    Bijlmakers, Leon
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (16)
  • [40] AUTONOMY AS PRACTICAL UNDERSTANDING
    Hadisi, Reza
    ERGO-AN OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2024, 11 : 911 - 946