A PSMA PET/CT-based risk model for prediction of concordance between targeted biopsy and combined biopsy in detecting prostate cancer

被引:0
作者
An, Chaoli [1 ,2 ]
Qiu, Xuefeng [1 ]
Liu, Beibei [1 ]
Song, Xiang [3 ]
Yang, Yu [3 ]
Shu, Jiaxin [3 ]
Fu, Yao [4 ]
Wang, Feng [5 ]
Zhao, Xiaozhi [2 ]
Guo, Hongqian [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, Affiliated Drum Tower Hosp, Dept Urol, Med Sch, Nanjing 210008, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ, Affiliated Drum Tower Hosp, Dept Androl, Med Sch, Nanjing 210008, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Univ Chinese Med, Nanjing Drum Tower Hosp, Clin Coll, Dept Urol, Nanjing 210008, Peoples R China
[4] Nanjing Univ, Affiliated Drum Tower Hosp, Dept Pathol, Med Sch, Nanjing 210008, Peoples R China
[5] Nanjing Med Univ, Nanjing Hosp 1, Dept Nucl Med, Nanjing 210003, Peoples R China
关键词
PSMA PET/CT; SUVmax; ADCmin; Prostate cancer; Biopsy concordance; Targeted biopsy; DIAGNOSIS; TISSUE;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-024-04947-w
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
PurposeThis study is to investigate the diagnostic value of 68Ga-PSMA-11 in improving the concordance between mpMRI-TB and combined biopsy (CB) in detecting PCa.Methods115 consecutive men with 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT prior to prostate biopsy were included for analysis. PSMA intensity, quantified as maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax), minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCmin) and other clinical characteristics were evaluated relative to biopsy concordance using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. A prediction model was developed based on the identified parameters, and a dynamic online diagnostic nomogram was constructed, with its discrimination evaluated through the area under the ROC curve (AUC) and consistency assessed using calibration plots. To assess its clinical applicability, a decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed, while internal validation was conducted using bootstrapping methods.ResultsConcordance between mpMRI-TB and CB occurred in 76.5% (88/115) of the patients. Multivariate logistic regression analyses performed that SUVmax (OR= 0.952; 95% CI 0.917-0.988; P= 0.010) and ADCmin (OR= 1.006; 95% CI 1.003-1.010; P= 0.001) were independent risk factors for biopsy concordance. The developed model showed a sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and AUC of 0.67, 0.78, 0.81 and 0.78 in the full sample. The calibration curve demonstrated that the nomogram's predicted outcomes closely resembled the ideal curve, indicating consistency between predicted and actual outcomes. Furthermore, the decision curve analysis (DCA) highlighted the clinical net benefit achievable across various risk thresholds. These findings were reinforced by internal validation.ConclusionsThe developed prediction model based on SUVmax and ADCmin showed practical value in guiding the optimization of prostate biopsy pattern. Lower SUVmax and Higher ADCmin values are associated with greater confidence in implementing mono-TB and safely avoiding SB, effectively balancing benefits and risks.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy Compared with Systematic Prostate Biopsy in Biopsy-naive Patients with Suspected Prostate Cancer [J].
Alkema, Nicolette G. ;
Hoogeveen, Sebastiaan F. J. S. ;
Cauberg, Evelyne C. C. ;
Witte, Lambertus P. W. ;
van't Veer-ten Kate, Miranda ;
de Boer, Erwin ;
Hoogland, Marije A. M. ;
Blanker, Marco H. ;
Boomsma, Martijn F. ;
Steffens, Martijn G. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2022, 44 :125-130
[2]   MRI-TRUS fusion guided prostate biopsy - initial experience and assessment of the role of contralateral lobe systematic biopsy [J].
Andras, Iulia ;
Crisan, Dana ;
Cata, Emanuel ;
Tamas-Szora, Attila ;
Caraiani, Cosmin ;
Coman, Radu-Tudor ;
Bungardean, Catalina ;
Mirescu, Claudiu ;
Coman, Ioan ;
Crisan, Nicolae .
MEDICAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY, 2019, 21 (01) :37-44
[3]   Optimizing Spatial Biopsy Sampling for the Detection of Prostate Cancer [J].
不详 .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 (03) :595-595
[4]   PSMA uptake on [68Ga]-PSMA-11-PET/CT positively correlates with prostate cancer aggressiveness [J].
Chen, Mengxia ;
Qiu, Xuefeng ;
Zhang, Qing ;
Zhang, Chengwei ;
Zhou, Yi-Hua ;
Zhao, Xiaozhi ;
Fu, Yao ;
Wang, Feng ;
Guo, Hongqian .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2022, 66 (01) :67-73
[5]   Machine learning-based analysis of [18F]DCFPyL PET radiomics for risk stratification in primary prostate cancer [J].
Cysouw, Matthijs C. F. ;
Jansen, Bernard H. E. ;
van de Brug, Tim ;
Oprea-Lager, Daniela E. ;
Pfaehler, Elisabeth ;
de Vries, Bart M. ;
van Moorselaar, Reindert J. A. ;
Hoekstra, Otto S. ;
Vis, Andre N. ;
Boellaard, Ronald .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2021, 48 (02) :340-349
[6]   Can SUVmax values of Ga-68-PSMA PET/CT scan predict the clinically significant prostate cancer? [J].
Demirci, Emre ;
Kabasakal, Levent ;
Sahin, Onur E. ;
Akgun, Elife ;
Gultekin, Mehmet Hamza ;
Doganca, Tunkut ;
Tuna, Mustafa B. ;
Obek, Can ;
Kilic, Mert ;
Esen, Tarik ;
Kural, Ali R. .
NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 40 (01) :86-91
[7]   Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness: Assessment with Whole-Lesion Histogram Analysis of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient [J].
Donati, Olivio F. ;
Mazaheri, Yousef ;
Afaq, Asim ;
Vargas, Hebert A. ;
Zheng, Junting ;
Moskowitz, Chaya S. ;
Hricak, Hedvig ;
Akin, Oguz .
RADIOLOGY, 2014, 271 (01) :143-152
[8]   MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy in Prostate Cancer Screening [J].
Eklund, Martin ;
Jaderling, Fredrik ;
Discacciati, Andrea ;
Bergman, Martin ;
Annerstedt, Magnus ;
Aly, Markus ;
Glaessgen, Axel ;
Carlsson, Stefan ;
Groenberg, Henrik ;
Nordstroem, Tobias .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2021, 385 (10) :908-920
[9]   The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System [J].
Epstein, Jonathan I. ;
Egevad, Lars ;
Amin, Mahul B. ;
Delahunt, Brett ;
Srigley, John R. ;
Humphrey, Peter A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2016, 40 (02) :244-252
[10]   Consensus statements on PSMA PET/CT response assessment criteria in prostate cancer [J].
Fanti, Stefano ;
Goffin, Karolien ;
Hadaschik, Boris A. ;
Herrmann, Ken ;
Maurer, Tobias ;
MacLennan, Steven ;
Oprea-Lager, Daniela E. ;
Oyen, Wim J. G. ;
Rouviere, Olivier ;
Mottet, Nicolas ;
Bjartell, Anders .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2021, 48 (02) :469-476