Alternatives to in vivo Draize rabbit eye and skin irritation tests with a focus on 3D reconstructed human cornea-like epithelium and epidermis models

被引：74
作者：
Lee M. [1 ]
Hwang J.-H. [1 ]
Lim K.-M. [1 ]
机构：
[1] College of Pharmacy, Ewha Womans University, Seoul
来源：
Toxicological Research | 2017年 / 33卷 / 3期
关键词：
3D reconstructed human cornea-like epithelium (RhCE) models; 3D reconstructed human epithelium (RhE) models; Alternative to animal tests; Eye irritation; Skin irritation;
D O I：
10.5487/TR.2017.33.3.191
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Human eyes and skin are frequently exposed to chemicals accidentally or on purpose due to their external location. Therefore, chemicals are required to undergo the evaluation of the ocular and dermal irritancy for their safe handling and use before release into the market. Draize rabbit eye and skin irritation test developed in 1944, has been a gold standard test which was enlisted as OECD TG 404 and OECD TG 405 but it has been criticized with respect to animal welfare due to invasive and cruel procedure. To replace it, diverse alternatives have been developed: (i) For Draize eye irritation test, organotypic assay, in vitro cytotoxicity- based method, in chemico tests, in silico prediction model, and 3D reconstructed human cornealike epithelium (RhCE); (ii) For Draize skin irritation test, in vitro cytotoxicity-based cell model, and 3D reconstructed human epidermis models (RhE). Of these, RhCE and RhE models are getting spotlight as a promising alternative with a wide applicability domain covering cosmetics and personal care products. In this review, we overviewed the current alternatives to Draize test with a focus on 3D human epithelium models to provide an insight into advancing and widening their utility.
引用
收藏
页码：191 / 203
页数：12
相关论文
共 127 条
[11]  
(2015)
[12]  
(2011)
[13]  
Griffith J.F., Nixon G.A., Bruce R.D., Reer P.J., Bannan E.A., Dose-response studies with chemical irritants in the albino rabbit eye as a basis for selecting optimum testing conditions for predicting hazard to the human eye, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol, 55, pp. 501-513, (1980)
[14]  
Freeberg F., Nixon G., Reer P., Weaver J., Bruce R., Griffith J., Sanders L.W., Human and rabbit eye responses to chemical insult, Toxicol. Sci, 7, pp. 626-634, (1986)
[15]  
Calvin G., New approaches to the assessment of eye and skin irritation, Toxicol. Lett, 64-65, pp. 157-164, (1992)
[16]  
Burton A., York M., Lawrence R., The in vitro assessment of severe eye irritants, Food Cosmet. Toxicol, 19, pp. 471-480, (1981)
[17]  
Whittle E., Basketter D., York M., Kelly L., Hall T., McCall J., Botham P., Esdaile D., Gardner J., Findings of an interlaboratory trial of the enucleated eye method as an alternative eye irritation test, Toxicol. Method, 2, pp. 30-41, (1992)
[18]  
York M., Wilson A., Newsome C., The classification of soluble silicates for eye hazard using the enucleated rabbit eye test, Toxicol. In Vitro, 8, pp. 1265-1268, (1994)
[19]  
Bruner L., Evans M., McPherson J., Southee J., Williamson P., Investigation of ingredient interactions in cosmetic formulations using isolated bovine corneas, Toxicol. In Vitro, 12, pp. 669-690, (1998)
[20]  
Prinsen M., Koeter H., Justification of the enucleated eye test with eyes of slaughterhouse animals as an alternative to the Draize eye irritation test with rabbits, Food Chem. Toxicol, 31, pp. 69-76, (1993)
12345678910