Clinically important improvement in the WOMAC and predictor factors for response to non-specific non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in osteoarthritic patients: A prospective study

被引:63
作者
Hmamouchi I. [1 ,2 ]
Allali F. [1 ,2 ]
Tahiri L. [1 ]
Khazzani H. [1 ]
Mansouri L. [1 ]
Ali Ou Alla S. [1 ]
Abouqal R. [2 ]
Hajjaj-Hassouni N. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Laboratory of Information and Research on Bone Diseases (LIRPOS), Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Rabat
[2] Laboratory of Biostatistical, Clinical and Epidemiological Research (LBRCE), Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Rabat
关键词
Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve; Minimal Clinically Important Difference; Transition Scale; Joint Space Width; NSAID Treatment;
D O I
10.1186/1756-0500-5-58
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The aims of the present study were first to detect MCID for WOMAC in a Moroccan population, and second, to identify the best pre-treatment predictors on the change of health after treatment by non-specific, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and to evaluate whether the predictors were dependent on the choice of the response criterion. Methods. The study involved 173 patients with osteoarthritis in whom primary care physicians decided to start treatment with non-selective NSAIDs. Assessments at admission and after 6 weeks were conducted. In order to determine the threshold levels associated with a definition of clinically important improvement, the receiver operating characteristic method was used. Three different measures of response to a 6-week NSAIDs treatment were used: one indirect measure (MCID in the total WOMAC score), one direct measure (transition question) and a combination of both criteria. Results: Eighty patients (46.3%) reported "a slightly better" general health status compared to that of 6 weeks before NSAIDs treatment. The MCID proportion is a 16.0% reduction in WOMAC. The most stable pre-treatment predictors on the improvement of health after treatment by NSAIDs were the absence of previous knee injury and a high level of education. Conclusions: In our data, a 16.0% reduction of the total WOMAC score from baseline was associated with the highest degree of improvement on the transition scale category. This cut-off point had good accuracy, and should be appropriate for use in the interpretation of clinical studies results, as well as in clinical care. © 2012 Hmamouchi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Reginster, J.-Y., The prevalence and burden of arthritis (2002) Rheumatology, 41 (SUPPL. 1), pp. 3-6
[2]  
Sharma, L., Cahue, S., Song, J., Hayes, K., Pai, Y.-C., Dunlop, D., Physical Functioning over Three Years in Knee Osteoarthritis: Role of Psychosocial, Local Mechanical, and Neuromuscular Factors (2003) Arthritis and Rheumatism, 48 (12), pp. 3359-3370. , DOI 10.1002/art.11420
[3]  
Jette, A.M., Haley, S.M., Coster, W.J., Kooyoomjian, J.T., Levenson, S., Heeren, T., Late life function and disability instrument (FDI) (2002) J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 57, pp. 209-216. , 10.1093/gerona/57.4.M209
[4]  
Murray, C.J.L., Lopez, A.D., Global mortality, disability, and the contribution of risk factors: Global burden of disease study (1997) Lancet, 349 (9063), pp. 1436-1442. , DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)07495-8
[5]  
Woolf, A.D., Pfleger, B., Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions (2003) Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 81 (9), pp. 646-656
[6]  
Angst, F., Aeschlimann, A., Stucki, G., Smallest detectable and minimal clinically important differences of rehabilitation intervention with their implications for required sample sizes using WOMAC and SF-36 quality of life measurement instruments in patients with osteoarthritis of the lower extremities (2001) Arthritis Care and Research, 45 (4), pp. 384-391
[7]  
Jaeschke, R., Singer, J., Guyatt, G.H., Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference (1989) Controlled Clinical Trials, 10 (4), pp. 407-415. , DOI 10.1016/0197-2456(89)90005-6
[8]  
Redelmeier, D.A., Lorig, K., Assessing the clinical importance of symptomatic improvements: An illustration in rheumatology (1993) Archives of Internal Medicine, 153 (11), pp. 1337-1342. , DOI 10.1001/archinte.153.11.1337
[9]  
Alzahrani, K., Gandhi, R., Debeer, J., Petruccelli, D., Mahomed, N., Prevalence of clinically significant improvement following total knee replacement (2011) J Rheumatol, 38, pp. 753-759. , 10.3899/jrheum.100233 21239743
[10]  
Escobar, A., Quintana, J.M., Bilbao, A., Arástegui, I., Lafuente, I., Vidaurreta, I., Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after total knee replacement (2007) Osteoarthr Cartil, 15, pp. 273-280. , 10.1016/j.joca.2006.09.001 17052924