Modeling of ligand binding to G protein coupled receptors: cannabinoid CB1, CB2 and adrenergic β2AR

被引:0
作者
Dorota Latek
Michal Kolinski
Umesh Ghoshdastider
Aleksander Debinski
Rafal Bombolewski
Anita Plazinska
Krzysztof Jozwiak
Slawomir Filipek
机构
[1] University of Warsaw,Faculty of Chemistry
[2] Medical University of Lublin,Department of Chemistry
[3] Goethe-University of Frankfurt/Main,Centre for Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance, Institute for Biophysical Chemistry
[4] University of Warsaw,Faculty of Physics
[5] International Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology,undefined
来源
Journal of Molecular Modeling | 2011年 / 17卷
关键词
Cannabinoid receptors; Docking; Fenoterol; GPCRs; Molecular dynamics; Molecular switches;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Cannabinoid and adrenergic receptors belong to the class A (similar to rhodopsin) G protein coupled receptors. Docking of agonists and antagonists to CB1 and CB2 cannabinoid receptors revealed the importance of a centrally located rotamer toggle switch and its possible participation in the mechanism of agonist/antagonist recognition. The switch is composed of two residues, F3.36 and W6.48, located on opposite transmembrane helices TM3 and TM6 in the central part of the membranous domain of cannabinoid receptors. The CB1 and CB2 receptor models were constructed based on the adenosine A2A receptor template. The two best scored conformations of each receptor were used for the docking procedure. In all poses (ligand-receptor conformations) characterized by the lowest ligand-receptor intermolecular energy and free energy of binding the ligand type matched the state of the rotamer toggle switch: antagonists maintained an inactive state of the switch, whereas agonists changed it. In case of agonists of β2AR, the (R,R) and (S,S) stereoisomers of fenoterol, the molecular dynamics simulations provided evidence of different binding modes while preserving the same average position of ligands in the binding site. The (S,S) isomer was much more labile in the binding site and only one stable hydrogen bond was created. Such dynamical binding modes may also be valid for ligands of cannabinoid receptors because of the hydrophobic nature of their ligand-receptor interactions. However, only very long molecular dynamics simulations could verify the validity of such binding modes and how they affect the process of activation.
引用
收藏
页码:2353 / 2366
页数:13
相关论文
共 367 条
  • [1] Warne T(2008)Structure of a beta(1)-adrenergic G-protein-coupled receptor Nature 454 486-491
  • [2] Serrano-Vega MJ(2007)High-resolution crystal structure of an engineered human beta(2)-adrenergic G protein-coupled receptor Science 318 1258-1265
  • [3] Baker JG(2007)GPCR engineering yields high-resolution structural insights into beta(2)-adrenergic receptor function Science 318 1266-1273
  • [4] Moukhametzianov R(2007)Crystal structure of the human beta(2) adrenergic G-protein- coupled receptor Nature 450 383-387
  • [5] Edwards PC(2008)The 2.6 angstrom crystal structure of a human A(2A) Adenosine receptor bound to an antagonist Science 322 1211-1217
  • [6] Henderson R(2000)Crystal structure of rhodopsin: a G protein-coupled receptor Science 289 739-745
  • [7] Leslie AGW(2002)beta(2) adrenergic receptor activation - modulation of the proline kink in transmembrane 6 by a rotamer toggle switch J Biol Chem 277 40989-40996
  • [8] Tate CG(2003)Role of the conserved NPxxY(x)(5, 6)F motif in the rhodopsin ground state and during activation Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100 2290-2295
  • [9] Schertler GFX(1996)Activation of the alpha(1b)-adrenergic receptor is initiated by disruption of an interhelical salt bridge constraint J Biol Chem 271 28318-28323
  • [10] Cherezov V(2004)Structural origins of constitutive activation in rhodopsin: role of the K296/E113 salt bridge Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101 12508-12513