Gender Roles and Date Context in Hypothetical Scripts for a Woman and a Man on a First Date in the Twenty-First Century

被引:0
作者
Jessica J. Cameron
Emma Curry
机构
[1] University of Manitoba,Department of Psychology
来源
Sex Roles | 2020年 / 82卷
关键词
Gender; First date; Scripts; Sexism; Change; Relationship initiation; Gender differences; Attitudes toward women; Cohort differences;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
First dates set the tone for future interactions and determine whether such interactions will even occur. Although people may want to showcase their virtues, first date scripts involving a man and a woman reflect traditional gender roles wherein men are expected to be proactive and women, reactive. As gender-based attitudes and roles have begun to change, are hypothetical first date scripts also evolving? Although over 25 years of research on first date scripts suggests that these scripts consistently reflect traditional gender roles, no known study to date has quantitatively compared data collected across temporal cohorts. To address this issue, in 2015 we collected hypothetical first date scripts using a checklist method with North American samples of 756 university students and 821 adults recruited online. People were more likely to endorse egalitarian first date scripts if they were women (adult sample only), describing a date between friends, and if they held less sexist attitudes. To address whether hypothetical first date scripts differ across time, we compared our younger adult sample to data reported by Laner and Ventrone (2000). Results revealed remarkable stability in gender stereotypes but also movement toward more egalitarian ideals. Although gender stereotypes in first date scripts might be weakening, enduring gendered scripts constrain behavior, create unrealistic expectations, and thwart authentic expression of one’s personality.
引用
收藏
页码:345 / 362
页数:17
相关论文
共 119 条
  • [1] Alksnis C(1996)Gender differences in scripts for different types of dates Sex Roles 34 321-336
  • [2] Desmarais S(2012)Online dating: The current status – And beyond Psychological Science in the Public Interest 13 1-2
  • [3] Wood E(2006)The dating game: Similarities and differences in dating scripts among college students Sexuality & Culture 10 54-80
  • [4] Aron A(1986)Turning points in developing romantic relationships Human Communication Research 12 469-493
  • [5] Bartoli AM(2011)Amazon's mechanical turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science 6 3-5
  • [6] Clark MD(2010)Acceptance is in the eye of the beholder: Self-esteem and motivated perceptions of acceptance from the opposite sex Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 99 513-529
  • [7] Baxter LA(1999)Strategic behaviors in romantic relationship initiation Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 25 707-720
  • [8] Bullis C(2016)Attitudes towards women’s work and family roles in the United States, 1976-2013 Psychology of Women Quarterly 40 41-54
  • [9] Buhrmester M(2003)Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men Psychological Bulletin 129 569-591
  • [10] Kwang T(2011)Has dating become more egalitarian? A 35 year review using Sex Roles 64 843-862