Timing of Displacement along the Yardoi Detachment Fault, Southern Tibet: Insights from Zircon U-Pb and Mica 40Ar−39Ar Geochronology

被引:0
作者
Hanwen Dong
Yuanku Meng
Zhiqin Xu
Hui Cao
Zhiyu Yi
Zeliang Ma
机构
[1] Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences,Key Laboratory of Deep
[2] Shandong University of Science and Technology,Earth Dynamics of Ministry of Natural Resources, Institute of Geology
[3] Nanjing University,College of Earth Science and Engineering
来源
Journal of Earth Science | 2019年 / 30卷
关键词
leucogranite; geochronology; Yardoi dome; southern Tibet; Himalayan Orogen;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Yardoi dome is located in the eastern end of the northwest-southeast extending North Himalayan domes (NHD). The dome exposes a granite pluton in the core and three lithologictectonic units separated by the upper detachment fault and the lower detachment fault. The Yardoi detachment fault (YDF), corresponding to the lower detachment fault, is a 800 m strongly deformed top-NW shear zone. LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb dating yielded a crystallization ages of 19.57±0.23 to 15.5±0.11 Ma for the leucogranite dyke swarm, which indicates that the ductile motion along the YDF began at ca. 20 Ma. The 40Ar/39Ar muscovite ages of 14.05±0.2 to 13.2±0.2 Ma and the 40Ar/39Ar biotite age of 13.15±0.2 Ma, suggest that the exhumation led to cooling through the 370 °C Ar closure temperature in muscovite at ≈14 Ma to the 335 °C Ar closure temperature in biotite at ≈13 Ma. Our new geochronological data from the Yardoi dome and other domes in the Tethyan Himalayan Sequences suggest that the ductile deformation in the region began at or before ≈36 Ma in a deep tectonic level, resulting in southward ductile flow at the mid-crustal tectonic level that continued from 20 to 13 Ma. Comparing the Yardoi dome to other domes in the NHD, the cooling ages show a clear diachronism and they are progressively younger from the West Himalayan to the East Himalayan.
引用
收藏
页码:535 / 548
页数:13
相关论文
共 170 条
[31]  
Zeng L S(2000)Evolution of North Himalayan Gneiss Domes: Structural and Metamorphic Studies in Mabja Dome, Southern Tibet Tectonics 19 872-895
[32]  
Hou K J(2006)Evolution of the Kangmar Dome, Southern Tibet: Structural, Petrologic, and Thermochronologic Constraints Geological Society London Special Publications 268 445-469
[33]  
Gao L E(2015)Oligocene-Miocene Middle Crustal Flow in Southern Tibet: Geochronology of Mabja Dome Tectonophysics 643 80-93
[34]  
Zeng L S(1996)Cenozoic Low Temperature Cooling History of the Northern Tethyan Himalaya in Zedang, SE Tibet and Its Implications Tectonophysics 253 83-109
[35]  
Asimow P D(1999)Modelling the Effect of Arbitrary Tectonics 18 793-808
[36]  
Grove M(2018) Histories on Argon Diffusion in Minerals Using the MacArgon Program for the Apple Macintosh Acta Petrologica Sinica 34 513-546
[37]  
Harrison T M(2018)Midcrustal Reflector on INDEPTH Wide-Angle Profiles: An Ophiolitic Slab beneath the India-Asia Suture in Southern Tibet? Acta Geologica Sinica-English Edition 92 462-481
[38]  
Guo L(2008)The Identification of the Eocene Magmatism and Tectonic Significance in the Middle Gangdese Magmatic Belt, Southern Tibet Tectonophysics 446 97-113
[39]  
Zhang J J(2006)Late Triassic Granites from the Quxu Batholith Shedding a New Light on the Evolution of the Gangdese Belt in Southern Tibet Tectonophysics 421 269-297
[40]  
Zhang B(2003)U-Pb SHRIMP Zircon Geochronology and The Journal of Geology 111 505-523