Timing of Displacement along the Yardoi Detachment Fault, Southern Tibet: Insights from Zircon U-Pb and Mica 40Ar−39Ar Geochronology

被引:0
作者
Hanwen Dong
Yuanku Meng
Zhiqin Xu
Hui Cao
Zhiyu Yi
Zeliang Ma
机构
[1] Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences,Key Laboratory of Deep
[2] Shandong University of Science and Technology,Earth Dynamics of Ministry of Natural Resources, Institute of Geology
[3] Nanjing University,College of Earth Science and Engineering
来源
Journal of Earth Science | 2019年 / 30卷
关键词
leucogranite; geochronology; Yardoi dome; southern Tibet; Himalayan Orogen;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Yardoi dome is located in the eastern end of the northwest-southeast extending North Himalayan domes (NHD). The dome exposes a granite pluton in the core and three lithologictectonic units separated by the upper detachment fault and the lower detachment fault. The Yardoi detachment fault (YDF), corresponding to the lower detachment fault, is a 800 m strongly deformed top-NW shear zone. LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb dating yielded a crystallization ages of 19.57±0.23 to 15.5±0.11 Ma for the leucogranite dyke swarm, which indicates that the ductile motion along the YDF began at ca. 20 Ma. The 40Ar/39Ar muscovite ages of 14.05±0.2 to 13.2±0.2 Ma and the 40Ar/39Ar biotite age of 13.15±0.2 Ma, suggest that the exhumation led to cooling through the 370 °C Ar closure temperature in muscovite at ≈14 Ma to the 335 °C Ar closure temperature in biotite at ≈13 Ma. Our new geochronological data from the Yardoi dome and other domes in the Tethyan Himalayan Sequences suggest that the ductile deformation in the region began at or before ≈36 Ma in a deep tectonic level, resulting in southward ductile flow at the mid-crustal tectonic level that continued from 20 to 13 Ma. Comparing the Yardoi dome to other domes in the NHD, the cooling ages show a clear diachronism and they are progressively younger from the West Himalayan to the East Himalayan.
引用
收藏
页码:535 / 548
页数:13
相关论文
共 170 条
[1]  
Aikman A B(2008)Evidence for Early (>44 Ma) Himalayan Crustal Thickening, Tethyan Himalaya, Southeastern Tibet Earth and Planetary Science Letters 274 14-23
[2]  
Harrison T M(2005)North-South Extension in the Tibetan Crust Triggered by Granite Emplacement Geology 33 853-856
[3]  
Ding L(2006)The Malashan Gneiss Dome in South Tibet: Comparative Study with the Kangmar Dome with Special Reference to Kinematics of Deformation and Origin of Associated Granites Geological Society London Special Publications 268 471-495
[4]  
Aoya M(1995)Stratigraphic Evidence for an Early Collision between Northwest India and Asia Nature 373 55-58
[5]  
Wallis S R(1992)The South Tibetan Detachment System, Himalayan Orogen: Extension Contemporaneous with and Parallel to Shortening in a Collisional Mountain Belt Geological Society America Special Paper 269 1-41
[6]  
Terada K(1985)North-South Extension within the Convergent Himalayan Region Geology 13 679-682
[7]  
Aoya M(1984)Tectonics and Structural Zonation of Southern Tibet, China Nature 311 219-223
[8]  
Wallis S R(1990)The Kangmar Dome: A Metamorphic Core Complex in Southern Xizang (Tibet) Science 250 1552-1556
[9]  
Kawakami T(2016)Tectonic Evolution of the Middle Crust in Southern Tibet from Structural and Kinematic Studies in the Lhagoi Kangri Gneiss Dome Lithosphere 8 480-504
[10]  
Beck R A(2016)Early Eocene (c. 50 Ma) Collision of the Indian and Asian Continents: Constraints from the North Himalayan Metamorphic Rocks, Southeastern Tibet Earth and Planetary Science Letters 435 64-73