Multi-criteria decision-making method based on dominance degree and BWM with probabilistic hesitant fuzzy information

被引:1
作者
Jian Li
Jian-qiang Wang
Jun-hua Hu
机构
[1] Central South University,School of Business
来源
International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics | 2019年 / 10卷
关键词
Probabilistic hesitant fuzzy element; Probabilistic distribution function; Dominance degree matrix; Best worst method; Fuzzy preference relations;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this paper, multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods with probabilistic hesitant fuzzy information are proposed based on the dominance degree of probabilistic hesitant fuzzy elements (PHFEs) and best worst method (BWM). First, we discuss the probabilistic distribution function of PHFE and the dominance degree matrix between two PHFEs. The dominance degree matrix is constructed based on the probabilistic distribution function of PHFE, which can be characterized as a fuzzy complementary judgment matrix. Second, BWM is extended to fuzzy preference relations based on the constructed dominance degree matrix. Subsequently, an algorithm is designed for selecting the best and worst weight vectors, and then two models are developed based on additive consistency and multiplicative consistency of fuzzy preference relations to derive the criteria weights. In addition, an algorithm is presented to improve the consistency of the dominance degree matrix when a desired consistency level is not achieved. Finally, the selection of best investment company is provided as an example to demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed methods.
引用
收藏
页码:1671 / 1685
页数:14
相关论文
共 140 条
[1]  
Ivanco M(2017)Sensitivity analysis method to address user disparities in the analytic hierarchy process Expert Syst Appl 90 111-126
[2]  
Hou G(2017)The analytic hierarchy process with interval preference statements Omega 67 177-185
[3]  
Michaeli J(2016)Intuitionistic multiplicative analytic hierarchy process in group decision making Comput Ind Eng 101 513-524
[4]  
Ahn BS(2014)Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: fallacy of the popular methods Eur J Oper Res 236 209-217
[5]  
Ren PJ(2014)Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with interval type-2 fuzzy sets Knowl Based Syst 59 48-57
[6]  
Xu ZS(2015)Consistency of the fused intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation in group intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process Appl Soft Comput 35 812-826
[7]  
Liao HC(2017)Multi-expert performance evaluation of healthcare institutions using an integrated intuitionistic fuzzy AHP&DEA methodology Knowl Based Syst 133 90-106
[8]  
Zhü KY(2018)An approach to interval-valued intuitionistic stochastic multi-criteria decision-making using set pair analysis Int J Mach Learn Cybernet 9 629-640
[9]  
Kahraman C(2014)Analytic hierarchy process-hesitant group decision making Eur J Oper Res 239 794-801
[10]  
Öztayşi B(2016)Hesitant analytic hierarchy process Eur J Oper Res 250 602-614