Connections among Puget Sound Residents’ Psychological Restoration from Natural Environments, Place Attachment, and Beliefs about Environmental Governance

被引:0
作者
Whitney Fleming
Mark Needham
Kelly Biedenweg
机构
[1] Oregon State University,Departmnet of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Sciences
[2] Oregon State University,Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society
来源
Environmental Management | 2022年 / 69卷
关键词
Psychological restoration; Place attachment; Structural equation modeling; Governance; Environmental management;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Psychological restoration and place attachment may be related to beliefs about environmental governance, with place attachment a likely mediator. We analyze data from a public survey in the Puget Sound area of Washington state (n = 2323) regarding beliefs about environmental governance, place attachment to the Puget Sound area, and psychological restoration related to this area. On average, individuals felt neutral in their beliefs about environmental governance, had high place attachment, and had high frequency of psychological restoration in natural environments. Structural equation modeling indicated that those who more frequently experienced psychological restoration from natural environments had stronger place attachment and more positive beliefs about environmental governance. Place attachment was significantly associated with governance perceptions, but explained only a small portion of variance (R2 = 0.02), while psychological restoration was significantly associated with place attachment and explained a moderate portion of its variance (R2 = 0.37). Place attachment fully mediated the effects of frequency of psychological restoration on beliefs about governance. Promoting psychological restoration and place attachment without attending to the process factors associated with good governance would not likely be a viable strategy for environmental managers to substantially increase positive beliefs about environmental governance.
引用
收藏
页码:258 / 270
页数:12
相关论文
共 207 条
[1]  
Ansell C(2018)Collaborative platforms as a governance strategy J Public Adm Res Theory 28 16-32
[2]  
Gash A(2014)From theoretical to actual ecosystem services: mapping beneficiaries and spatial flows in ecosystem service assessments. Ecol Soc 19 64-148
[3]  
Bagstad K(2021)Linking trust, performance, and governance quality: What can explain the incongruity? Commonw Comp Politics 59 128-1182
[4]  
Villa F(1986)The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51 1173-96
[5]  
Batker D(2019)Local support for conservation is associated with perceptions of good governance, social impacts, and ecological effectiveness Conserv Lett 12 e12640-376
[6]  
Harrison-Cox J(2007)Preference for nature in urbanized societies: stress, restoration, and the pursuit of sustainability J Soc Issues 63 79-390
[7]  
Voigt B(2017)A comparative study of human well-being indicators across three puget sound regions Soc Nat Resour 30 362-37
[8]  
Johnson G(2014)Developing human wellbeing indicators in the Puget Sound: focusing on the watershed scale. Coast Manage 42 374-354
[9]  
Baniamin HM(2017)The science and politics of human well-being: a case study in cocreating indicators for Puget Sound restoration. Ecol Soc 22 11-343
[10]  
Baron RM(2016)A holistic framework for identifying human wellbeing indicators for marine policy Mar Policy 64 31-328