Simulation of breaking waves using the high-order spectral method with laboratory experiments: wave-breaking energy dissipation

被引:0
作者
Betsy R. Seiffert
Guillaume Ducrozet
机构
[1] Florida Atlantic University,Department of Ocean & Mechanical Engineering
[2] École Centrale de Nantes,undefined
[3] LHEEA Lab,undefined
[4] UMR CNRS 6598,undefined
[5] Institut de Recherche Technologique Jules Verne,undefined
来源
Ocean Dynamics | 2018年 / 68卷
关键词
Wave-breaking; High-order spectral method; Laboratory experiments; Numerical wave tank; Wave focusing;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We examine the implementation of a wave-breaking mechanism into a nonlinear potential flow solver. The success of the mechanism will be studied by implementing it into the numerical model HOS-NWT, which is a computationally efficient, open source code that solves for the free surface in a numerical wave tank using the high-order spectral (HOS) method. Once the breaking mechanism is validated, it can be implemented into other nonlinear potential flow models. To solve for wave-breaking, first a wave-breaking onset parameter is identified, and then a method for computing wave-breaking associated energy loss is determined. Wave-breaking onset is calculated using a breaking criteria introduced by Barthelemy et al. (J Fluid Mech https://arxiv.org/pdf/1508.06002.pdf, submitted) and validated with the experiments of Saket et al. (J Fluid Mech 811:642–658, 2017). Wave-breaking energy dissipation is calculated by adding a viscous diffusion term computed using an eddy viscosity parameter introduced by Tian et al. (Phys Fluids 20(6): 066,604, 2008, Phys Fluids 24(3), 2012), which is estimated based on the pre-breaking wave geometry. A set of two-dimensional experiments is conducted to validate the implemented wave breaking mechanism at a large scale. Breaking waves are generated by using traditional methods of evolution of focused waves and modulational instability, as well as irregular breaking waves with a range of primary frequencies, providing a wide range of breaking conditions to validate the solver. Furthermore, adjustments are made to the method of application and coefficient of the viscous diffusion term with negligible difference, supporting the robustness of the eddy viscosity parameter. The model is able to accurately predict surface elevation and corresponding frequency/amplitude spectrum, as well as energy dissipation when compared with the experimental measurements. This suggests the model is capable of calculating wave-breaking onset and energy dissipation successfully for a wide range of breaking conditions. The model is also able to successfully calculate the transfer of energy between frequencies due to wave focusing and wave breaking. This study is limited to unidirectional waves but provides a valuable basis for future application of the wave-breaking model to a multidirectional wave field. By including parameters for removing energy due to wave-breaking into a nonlinear potential flow solver, the risk of developing numerical instabilities due to an overturning wave is decreased, thereby increasing the application range of the model, including calculating more extreme sea states. A computationally efficient and accurate model for the generation of a nonlinear random wave field is useful for predicting the dynamic response of offshore vessels and marine renewable energy devices, predicting loads on marine structures, and in the study of open ocean wave generation and propagation in a realistic environment.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 89
页数:24
相关论文
共 139 条
  • [1] Babanin AV(2010)Numerical and laboratory investigation of breaking of steep two-dimensional waves in deep water J Fluid Mech 644 433-208
  • [2] Chalikov D(2016)A new level set numerical wave tank with improved density interpolation for complex wave hydrodynamics Comput Fluids 140 191-273
  • [3] Young IR(2005)Modeling extreme waves based on equations of potential flow with a free surface J Comput Phys 210 247-133
  • [4] Savelyev I(1999)Two-dimensional navier–stokes simulation of breaking waves Phys Fluids 11 121-56
  • [5] Bihs H(2000)Boussinesq modeling of wave transformation, breaking, and runup. ii: 2d J Waterw Port Coastal Ocean Eng 126 48-129
  • [6] Kamath A(2016)Air entrainment and bubble statistics in breaking waves J Fluid Mech 801 91-581
  • [7] Chella MA(2016)Breaking-onset, energy and momentum flux in unsteady focused wave packets J Fluid Mech 790 553-506
  • [8] Aggarwal A(2014)Bubble entrainment and liquid–bubble interaction under unsteady breaking waves J Fluid Mech 761 464-138
  • [9] Arntsen ØA(2016)Wave breaking in the surf zone and deep-water in a non-hydrostatic RANS model. Part 1: Organized wave motions Ocean Modelling 107 125-150
  • [10] Chalikov D(2016)Wave breaking in the surf zone and deep-water in a non-hydrostatic RANS model. Part 2: Turbulence and mean circulation Ocean Modelling 107 139-1302