Spatiotemporal change of ecological footprint and sustainability analysis for Yangtze Delta Region

被引:0
作者
Ping Wang
Xinjun Wang
机构
[1] Fudan University,Department of Environmental Science and Engineering
来源
Journal of Geographical Sciences | 2011年 / 21卷
关键词
ecological footprint; spatiotemporal analysis; sustainable development index; STIRPAT model; Yangtze Delta Region;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In the urbanizing world, the Yangtze Delta Region (YDR) as one of the most developed regions in China, has drawn a lot of the world’s attention for the remarkable economic development achieved in the past decades. Nevertheless, the rapid economic development was certain to be accompanied by unprecedented consumption and loss of natural resources. Therefore, the analysis of the ecological situation and driving factors of environmental impact was of great significance to serve the local sustainable development decision-making and build a harmonious society. In this paper, the ecological footprint (EF) was taken as the index of the ecological environmental impact. With the help of Geographic Information System (GIS), we studied the spatiotemporal change of ecological footprint at two scales (region and city) and assessed urban sustainable development ability in YDR. Then we discussed the driving factors that affected the change of ecological footprint by the Stochastic Impacts by Regression on Population, Affluence, and Technology (STIRPAT) model. The results showed that increasing trends of regional ecological footprint during 1998–2008 (1.70–2.53 ha/cap) were accompanied by decreasing ecological capacity (0.31–0.25 ha/cap) but expanding ecological deficit (1.39–2.28 ha/cap). The distribution pattern of ecological footprint and the degree of sustainable development varied distinctly from city to city in YDR. In 2008, the highest values of ecological footprint (3.85 ha/cap) and the lowest one of sustainable development index (SDI=1) in YDR were both presented in Shanghai. GDP per capita (A) was the most dominant driving force of EF and the classical EKC hypothesis did not exist between A and EF in 1998–2008. Consequently, increasing in ecological supply and reducing in human demand due to technological advances or other factors were one of the most effective ways to promote sustainable development in YDR. Moreover, importance should be attached to change our definition and measurement of prosperity and success.
引用
收藏
页码:859 / 868
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Bagliani M.(2008)A consumption-based approach to Environmental Kuznets Curves using the ecological footprint indicator Ecological Economics 65 650-661
[2]  
Bravo G.(1994)Rethinking the environmental impacts of population, affluence and technology Human Ecology Review 1 277-300
[3]  
Dalmazzone S.(2007)Driving the human ecological footprint Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 5 13-18
[4]  
Dietz T.(2009)Economic polarized trends, function and expanded boundaries of the Yangtze Delta Region Journal of Geographical Sciences 19 733-749
[5]  
Rosa E. A.(2009)Analysis of the major drivers of the ecological footprint using the STIRPAT model and the PLS method: A case study in Henan Province, China Ecological Economics 68 2818-2824
[6]  
Dietz T.(2010)Assessing the temporal stability of the population/environment relationship in comparative perspective: A cross-national panel study of carbon dioxide emissions, 1960–2005 Population and Environment 32 27-41
[7]  
Rosa E. A.(2010)Age-structure, urbanization, and climate change in developed countries: Revisiting STIRPAT for disaggregated population and consumption-related environmental impacts Population and Environment 31 317-343
[8]  
York R.(2009)Analysis of the environmental impact of China based on STIRPAT model Environmental Impact Assessment Review 29 341-347
[9]  
Duan X.(2006)Impacts of population, affluence and technology on water footprint in China Acta Ecological Sinica 26 3359-3365
[10]  
Yu X.(2008)Measuring sustainable development: Nation by nation Ecological Economics 64 470-474