Indirect vs. Direct Effects of Anthropogenic Sulfate on the Climate of East Asia as Simulated with a Regional Coupled Climate-Chemistry/Aerosol Model

被引:0
作者
Filippo Giorgi
Xungqiang Bi
Yun Qian
机构
[1] Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics,
[2] Pacific Northwest National Laboratory,undefined
来源
Climatic Change | 2003年 / 58卷
关键词
Precipitation; Optical Property; Indirect Effect; Warm Season; Cold Season;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We intercompare a series of multi-year simulations with a coupled regionalchemistry-climate model for east Asia to assess the relative importance ofdirect and indirect (Type I) effects of anthropogenic sulfate on the climateof the region. Both direct and indirect aerosol effects induce a negativeradiative forcing that results in a cooling of the surface and in a decrease of precipitation. Under present day sulfur emissions,the direct aerosol effects prevail during the cold season, while the indirecteffects dominate in the warm season (when cloudiness is maximum over the region). When both the direct and indirect effects are included, the surface cooling varies in the range of –0.1 to over –1 K throughout the region and extended areas ofstatistically significant cooling are found in all seasons except winter.The indirect effects largely dominate in inhibiting precipitation, especiallyduring the summer. When doubling the sulfur emissions, the direct effects aresubstantially strengthened, while the indirect effects are only marginally affected. This indicates that the indirect effects over the region might be asymptotically approaching their maximum efficiency. Overall, the indirect effects appear necessary to explain theobserved temperature record over some regions of China, at least in the warm season.A number of uncertainties need to be addressed, such as due to Type IIindirect effects, modeling of the relationship between aerosol concentration and cloud optical properties, and contribution of aerosols other than anthropogenic sulfate.
引用
收藏
页码:345 / 376
页数:31
相关论文
共 167 条
  • [1] Barrie L. A.(2000)A Comparison of Large Scale Atmospheric Sulfate Aerosol Models (COSAM): Overview and Highlights Tellus 53B 615-645
  • [2] Yi Y.(1995)The Sulfate-CCN-Cloud Albedo Effect: A Sensitivity Study with Two General Circulation Models Tellus 47B 281-300
  • [3] Leaitch W. R.(1992)Delta-Eddington Approximation for Solar Radiation in the NCAR Community Climate Model J. Geophys. Res. 97 7603-7612
  • [4] Lohmann U.(1994)Growth of Continental Scale Metro-Agro-Plexes, Regional Ozone Pollution andWorld Food Production Science 264 74-77
  • [5] Kasibhatla P.(1999)Is Ozone Pollution Affecting Crop Yields in China? Geophys. Res. Lett. 26 867-870
  • [6] Roelofs G. J.(1999)A Case Study of the Effects of Atmospheric Aerosols and Regional Haze on Agriculture: An Opportunity to Enhance Crop Yields in China through Emission Controls? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 96 13626-13633
  • [7] Wilson J.(1990)Sulphate Aerosols and Climate Nature 348 22-430
  • [8] Mc-Govern F.(1992)Climate Forcing by Anthropogenic Aerosols Science 255 423-1144
  • [9] Benkovitz C.(1989)Two-Dimensional Simulations of Possible Mesoscale Effects NuclearWar Fires. I: Model Description J. Geophys. Res. 94 1127-29521
  • [10] Melieres M. A.(2000)A Study of Internal Variability of a Regional Climate Model J. Geophys. Res. 105 29503-14376