Robotics confers an advantage in right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis when matched against conventional laparoscopy

被引:27
作者
Ngu J.C.-Y. [1 ]
Ng Y.Y.-R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of General Surgery, Changi General Hospital, 2, Simei Street 3, Singapore
关键词
Intracorporeal anastomosis; Laparoscopic; Right hemicolectomy; Robotic; Xi;
D O I
10.1007/s11701-018-0793-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Comparisons between robotic and laparoscopic right hemicolectomy have been confounded by variations in operative technique. This study evaluates the two procedures after standardizing the intraoperative steps and perioperative management. Patients who underwent robotic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal bowel anastomosis between July 2015 and June 2017 were matched with a laparoscopic group. Perioperative management was in accordance to an enhanced recovery protocol. Outcomes and histopathological data were compared. Thirty-two patients were included. Amongst the patients who did not undergo complete mesocolic excision, the median operative time did not differ between the two groups (p = 0.413). The robotic group recorded a statistically shorter time for intracorporeal anastomosis (13 vs 19 min, p = 0.024). Postoperative recovery and complication rates were similar, except for a greater lymph node harvest in the robotic group (41 vs 31, p = 0.038). Robotic surgery achieves short-term results comparable to existing conventional laparoscopy, notwithstanding the advantages of enhanced ergonomics. © 2018, Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
引用
收藏
页码:647 / 653
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Young-Fadok T.M., Nelson H., Laparoscopic right colectomy: five-step procedure, Dis Colon Rectum, 43, pp. 267-271, (2000)
[2]  
Senagore A.J., Delaney C.P., Brady K.M., Fazio V.W., Standardized approach to laparoscopic right colectomy: outcomes in 70 consecutive cases, J Am Coll Surg, 5, pp. 675-679, (2004)
[3]  
A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer, N Engl J Med, 350, pp. 2050-2059, (2004)
[4]  
Hellan M., Anderson C., Pigazzi A., Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy, J Soc Laparosc Surg, 13, pp. 312-317, (2009)
[5]  
Scatizzi M., Kroning K.C., Borrelli A., Andan G., Lenzi E., Feroci F., Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic right colectomy for cancer: a case-control study, World J Surg, 34, pp. 2902-2908, (2010)
[6]  
deSouza A., Domajnko B., Park J., Marecik S., Prasad L., Abcarian H., Incisional hernia, midline versus low transverse incision: what is the ideal incision for specimen extraction and hand-assisted laparoscopy?, Surg Endosc, 25, pp. 1031-1036, (2011)
[7]  
Samia H., Lawrence J., Nobel T., Stein S., Champagne B.J., Delaney C.P., Extraction site location and incisional hernias after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: should we be avoiding the midline?, Am J Surg, 205, 3, pp. 264-268, (2013)
[8]  
Benlice C., Stocchi L., Costedio M.M., Gorgun E., Kessler H., Impact of the specific extraction-site location on the risk of incisional hernia after laparoscopic colorectal resection, Dis Colon Rectum, 59, 8, pp. 743-750, (2016)
[9]  
Jamali F.R., Soweid A.M., Dimassi H., Bailey C., Leroy J., Marescaux J., Evaluating the degree of difficulty of laparoscopic colorectal surgery, Arch Surg, 143, 8, pp. 762-767, (2008)
[10]  
Stein S.A., Bergamaschi R., Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis, Tech Coloproctol, 17, pp. S35-S39, (2013)