Can the Locked-In Be Unlocked? University Stratification in China Under State-Led Quest for World-Class Universities

被引:0
作者
Kun Wang
Calvin King Lam Chung
Jiang Xu
Alan Chi Keung Cheung
机构
[1] Guangdong Academy of Sciences,Guangzhou Institute of Geography
[2] The Chinese University of Hong Kong,Department of Geography and Resource Management
[3] The Chinese University of Hong Kong,Department of Educational Administration and Policy
来源
Higher Education Policy | 2024年 / 37卷
关键词
University stratification; New public management; World-class universities; Double world-class project; Lock-in cycle; China;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Emerging studies on university stratification have often attributed the developmental gaps between universities to the popularization of new public management in contexts where market mechanisms prevail in higher education governance. However, less attention has been paid to how state powers continue to mediate university stratification alongside market influence. Embracing the competitive emphasis of new public management, the Chinese state has launched a new world-class university scheme, the Double World-class (DWC) Project, replacing the past one, Project 985/211. Tracing the continuities and changes from Project 985/211 to the DWC Project, this study examines the mechanisms and outcomes of China’s university stratification at two levels. Firstly, the DWC Project has reproduced and reinforced the overall stratified landscape of China’s universities. The state-designated hierarchy of elite and non-elite universities is reproduced in a more complex form of market-based stratification through what we propose as a “lock-in cycle” mechanism. Secondly, the DWC Project is nonetheless reshuffling the internal stratification of elite universities in three aspects: privileged identities are becoming volatile, which catalyzes inter-university competition financed by local governments; the distinction between central and local universities is collapsing when stratification becomes increasingly discipline-based; and the rising market-based stratification is challenging the state-designated hierarchy and the lock-in cycle.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 20
页数:19
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Beerkens M(2013)Competition and concentration in the academic research industry: an empirical analysis of the sector dynamics in Australia 1990–2008 Science & Public Policy 40 157-170
[2]  
Breen R(2005)Inequality of opportunity in comparative perspective: recent research on educational attainment and social mobility Annual Review of Sociology 31 223-243
[3]  
Jonsson JO(2012)The stratification of universities: structural inequality in Canada and the United States Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 30 143-158
[4]  
Davies S(2010)Is Inequality among Universities Increasing? Gini Coefficients and the Elusive Rise of Elite Universities Minerva 48 55-72
[5]  
Zarifa D(2019)How far has the state “stepped back”: an exploratory study of the changing governance of higher education in China (1978–2018) Higher Education 78 931-946
[6]  
Halffman W(2012)Performance-based university research funding systems Research Policy 41 251-261
[7]  
Leydesdorff L(2018)Is the gap widening among universities? On research output inequality and its measurement in the korean higher education system Quality & Quantity 52 589-606
[8]  
Han S(2016)Are universities becoming more unequal? Review of Higher Education 39 479-514
[9]  
Xu X(2004)A critique of institutional inequalities in higher education (or an alternative to hypocrisy for higher educational policy) Theory and Research in Education 2 31-48
[10]  
Hicks D(2012)World-class higher education and the emerging Chinese model of the university Prospects 42 319-339