Energy efficiency of the industrial sectors in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration: does technological gap matter?

被引:0
作者
Xiaoling Ouyang
Qiuping Jian
Zhujun Jiang
机构
[1] East China Normal University,School of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Management
[2] East China University of Science and Technology,Business School
来源
Environmental Science and Pollution Research | 2022年 / 29卷
关键词
Malmquist energy efficiency performance; Technology gap ratio; Tobit model; Total factor energy efficiency; Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
As the political and technological innovation center of China, Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration (BTHUA) is an important engine of national economic development. However, the BTHUA is faced with uneven industrial development and environmental pollution problems. Energy efficiency of the industrial sector, critical to energy conservation and environmental protection, is the key to achieving green economic transformation. For this reason, this study adopts the parametric meta-frontier approach to measure the industrial total-factor energy efficiency (TFEE) of the BTHUA, centering on the evaluation of regional technology gap ratio (TGR). Empirical results indicate that there are significant regional disparities of industrial TFEE in the BTHUA. In particular, industrial TFEE tends to be underestimated without considering technological heterogeneity in production technology. The TGRs of manufacturing cities, tourist cities, and the modernized metropolis (Beijing) are the highest among the region. On this basis, the influencing factors of industrial TFEE of the BTHUA are further accessed based on the fixed effects model and the Tobit model. This article verifies that the evaluation of TFEE in the BTHUA must take regional technological gap into account, and provides additional empirical evidence on how to promote coordinated regional industrial development and energy efficiency improvement.
引用
收藏
页码:52263 / 52276
页数:13
相关论文
共 144 条
[1]  
Baloch ZA(2020)Trilemma assessment of energy intensity, efficiency, and environmental index: evidence from BRICS countries Environ Sci Pollut Res 27 34337-34347
[2]  
Tan Q(2021)Assessing energy efficiency in the Asia-Pacific region and the mediating role of environmental pollution: evidence from a super-efficiency model with a weighting preference scheme Environ Sci Pollut Res 28 48581-48594
[3]  
Iqbal N(2004)A metafrontier production function for estimation of technical efficiencies and technology gaps for firms operating under different technologies J Prod Anal 21 91-103
[4]  
Mohsin M(2014)Energy intensity, target level of energy intensity, and room for improvement in energy intensity: an application to the study of regions in the EU Energy Policy 67 648-655
[5]  
Abbas Q(1998)Learning by doing, the technology gap, and growth Int Econ Rev 39 697-721
[6]  
Iqbal W(2017)International comparison of total-factor energy productivity growth: a parametric Malmquist index approach Energy 118 481-488
[7]  
Chaudhry IS(2017)Analysis of energy efficiency and energy savings potential in China’s provincial industrial sectors J Clean Prod 164 1531-1541
[8]  
Baloch ZA(2015)Energy efficiency analysis method based on fuzzy DEA cross-model for ethylene production systems in chemical industry Energy 83 685-695
[9]  
Tan Q(1969)Sources of agricultural productivity gap among selected countries Am J Agr Econ 3 564-575
[10]  
Khan MZ(2018)Analysis on provincial industrial energy efficiency and its influencing factors in China based on DEA-RS-FANN Energy 142 79-89