Efficacy and safety of long-term botulinum toxin treatment for acquired cervical dystonia: a 25-year follow-up

被引:0
作者
Martina Petracca
Maria Rita Lo Monaco
Tamara Ialongo
Enrico Di Stasio
Maria Luana Cerbarano
Loredana Maggi
Alessandro De Biase
Giulia Di Lazzaro
Paolo Calabresi
Anna Rita Bentivoglio
机构
[1] Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS,Movement Disorders Unit
[2] Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “Agostino Gemelli”-IRCCS,Medicine of the Ageing
[3] Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS,Biochemistry and Clinical Biochemistry
[4] Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS,Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine Unit
[5] Sapienza University of Rome,Department of Human Neurosciences
[6] University of Rome Tor Vergata,Department of Systems Medicine
[7] Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore,Institute of Neurology
来源
Journal of Neurology | 2023年 / 270卷
关键词
Botulinum toxin A; Acquired cervical dystonia; Long-term outcome; Safety; Efficacy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Botulinum toxin A (BoNT/A) is the first-line treatment for idiopathic cervical dystonia (ICD) and is widely used in the clinical setting. To date, scanty data are available on the effectiveness of BoNT in treating acquired cervical dystonia (ACD). Here we present a long-term follow-up of ACD patients treated with BoNT/A that focused on safety and efficacy. The study included subjects who had received at least six treatments of three commercially available BoNT/A drugs [abobotulinumtoxinA (A/Abo), incobotulinumtoxinA (A/Inco) and onabotulinumtoxinA (A/Ona)]. Safety and efficacy were assessed based on patients' self-reports regarding adverse effects (AE), duration of improvement of dystonia and/or pain relief. Global clinical improvement was measured on a six-point scale. 23 patients with ACD were administered 739 treatments (A/Abo in 235, A/Inco in 72, A/Ona in 432) with a mean number of treatments of 31 ± 20 (range 6–76) and duration of 10 ± 6 weeks (range 2–25). The mean dose was 737 ± 292 U for A/Abo, 138 ± 108 U for A/Inco and 158 ± 80 U for A/Ona. The average benefit duration was 89 ± 26 (A/Abo), 88 ± 30 days (A/Inco), and 99 ± 55 days (A/Ona) (p = 0.011); global clinical improvement for all sessions was 4 ± 1. ANOVA one-way analysis indicated that A/Ona had the best profile in terms of duration (p < 0.05), whereas A/Abo had the best pain relief effect (p = 0.002). Side effects were reported in 9% of treatments (67/739), with ten treatments (1%) complicated by two side effects. Most side effects were rated mild to moderate; severe side effects occurred following three treatments with the three different BoNT; two required medical intervention. No allergic reactions were reported. Even after 25 years of repeated treatments, all serotypes of BoNT demonstrate positive effects in treating ACD with long-lasting efficacy and safety.
引用
收藏
页码:340 / 347
页数:7
相关论文
共 131 条
[61]  
Vivancos-Matellano F(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[62]  
Ybot-Gorrin I(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[63]  
Diez-Tejedor E(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[64]  
Mejia NI(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[65]  
Vuong KD(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[66]  
Jankovic J(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[67]  
Hsiung G-YR(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[68]  
Das SK(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[69]  
Ranawaya R(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[70]  
Lafontaine A-L(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined