Teachers’ perceptions of autonomy in the tensions between a subject focus and a cross-curricular school profile: A case study of a Finnish upper secondary school

被引:0
作者
Janne Elo
Christina Nygren-Landgärds
机构
[1] Åbo Akademi University,Faculty of Education and Welfare Studies
[2] University of Agder,Faculty of Humanities and Education
来源
Journal of Educational Change | 2021年 / 22卷
关键词
Curriculum development; High-stakes testing; School development; Teacher autonomy; Upper secondary school;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Recent research has indicated global trends of decreasing teacher autonomy and increasing teacher accountability. Standardised national tests have been identified as one of many factors constraining teacher autonomy. Another trend influencing teachers’ scope of action is the profiling and branding of schools that compete for students. This qualitative case study concerns the general upper secondary level in Finland, the only level of education in the country with a high-stakes final examination—the matriculation exam. The upper secondary level is generally regarded as Finland’s most subject-focused level of education. In contrast to this subject-focused tradition, the case school for this research has developed a cross-curricular profile emphasising creativity, boundary crossing and an outward orientated approach. The study explores the teachers’ perceptions of how their autonomy is constrained in this context characterised by tensions between the cross-curricular school profile on one hand, and the subject-focused tradition and student evaluations on the other. Although one might expect these tensions to constrain teacher autonomy, the results show that the teachers, in fact, experience the cross-curricular school profile as increasing their individual autonomy. The study demonstrates that upper secondary teachers can experience extensive autonomy despite global trends of increasing teacher accountability and diminishing teacher autonomy.
引用
收藏
页码:423 / 445
页数:22
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
Antikainen A(2006)In search of the Nordic model in education Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 50 229-243
[2]  
Collard P(2014)Nurturing creativity in education European Journal of Education 49 348-364
[3]  
Looney J(2008)Re-branding urban schools: Urban revitalization, social status, and marketing public schools to the upper middle class Journal of Education Policy 23 165-179
[4]  
Cucchiara M(2016)School brand management: The policies, practices, and perceptions of branding and marketing in New York City’s public high schools Urban Education 51 447-475
[5]  
DiMartino C(2016)‘Walking a fine line’: Teachers’ perception of curricular autonomy in Estonia, Finland and Germany Journal of Curriculum Studies 48 589-609
[6]  
Butler Jessen S(2018)School competition and social stratification in the deregulated upper secondary school market in Stockholm British Journal of Sociology of Education 39 891-907
[7]  
Erss M(2015)Three forms of professional autonomy: De-professionalisation of teachers in a new light Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy 2 20-29
[8]  
Kalmus V(2015)Metamorphoses of pedagogical autonomy in German school reforms: Continuities, discontinuities and synchronicities illustrated by empirical studies on school development planning, school profiling and school inspection Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy 2 51-61
[9]  
Autio TH(2003)On the evaluation of curriculum reforms Journal of Curriculum Studies 35 459-478
[10]  
Forsberg H(2016)We’re all creatives now: Democratized creativity and education Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies 13 32-44