The determinants of compensation report transparency: manager incentives and firm characteristics

被引:0
作者
Pfeiffer I. [1 ]
Jarchow S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Technical University Munich (TUM), Arcisstrasse 21, Munich
[2] Center for Entrepreneurial and Financial Studies (CEFS), Technical University Munich (TUM), Arcisstrasse 21, Munich
关键词
Compensation disclosure; Corporate governance; Excessive compensation; Executive compensation; G30; J33; M12; M52;
D O I
10.1007/s11573-023-01180-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper analyses the determinants of disclosure in compensation reports. Using a hand-collected dataset of 429 observations we assess which compensation, governance and ownership variables influence the quality of disclosure in compensation reports from 2006 to 2014 in a German setting. Managers have incentives to conceal compensation disclosure leading to a conflict of interest with shareholders. The overall findings suggest that opportunistic reporting incentives, as proposed by the managerial power theory, cannot explain a lack of more detailed disclosure. Managers rather avoid these disclosures because they would require additional effort. The empirical analyses reveal four major disclosure determinants: company size, age, family members in the boards and verticality. Other variables such as proprietary costs, governance variables and performance show no or no stable influence. The absence of disclosure is therefore a confluence of company resources (company size and forecasts increase disclosure), owner interests (family members in the board decreases disclosure), and concerns about social equity infringement (higher pay inequity leads to lower disclosure). © The Author(s) 2023.
引用
收藏
页码:659 / 691
页数:32
相关论文
共 83 条
  • [1] Ali A., Chen T.-Y., Radhakrishnan S., Corporate disclosures by family firms, J Account Econ, 44, 1-2, pp. 238-286, (2007)
  • [2] Ampenberger M., Schmid T., Achleitner A.-K., Kaserer C., Capital structure decisions in family firms: empirical evidence from a bank-based economy, Rev Manag Sci, 7, 3, pp. 247-275, (2013)
  • [3] Andreas J., Rapp M., Wolff M., Determinants of director compensation in two-tier systems: evidence from German panel data, Rev Manag Sci, 6, 1, pp. 33-79, (2012)
  • [4] Andres C., Fernau E., Theissen E., Should I stay or should I go? Former CEOs as monitors, J Corp Financ, 28, pp. 26-47, (2014)
  • [5] Arnold M., Grasser R., What is a fair amount of executive compensation? Outrage potential of two key stakeholder groups, J Bus Fin Acc, 45, pp. 651-685, (2018)
  • [6] Baums T., Scott K., Taking shareholder protection seriously? Corporate Governance in the U.S. and Germany, J Appl Corp Financ, 17, 4, pp. 44-63, (2005)
  • [7] Bebchuk L.A., Fried J., Stealth compensation via retirement benefits, (2004)
  • [8] Bebchuk L., Fried J., Walker D., Executive Compensation in America: Optimal Contracting Or Extraction of Rents?, (2001)
  • [9] Beck D., Friedl G., Schafer P., Executive compensation in Germany, J Bus Econ, 90, pp. 787-824, (2020)
  • [10] Ben-Amar W., Zeghal D., Board of directors’ independence and executive compensation disclosure transparency. Canadian evidence, J Appl Account Res, 12, 1, pp. 43-60, (2011)