Salt tolerance in rice in vitro: Implication of accumulation of Na+, K+ and proline

被引:0
|
作者
Sangita Basu
Gaurab Gangopadhyay
B.B. Mukherjee
机构
[1] Brahmananda Keshab Chandra College,Department of Botany
[2] Bose Institute,undefined
来源
关键词
growth; K; Na; proline; rice (; L.); salt-shock;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The implication of accumulation of both inorganic (Na+, K+) and organic (proline) solutes were evaluated in unadapted and NaCl-adapted callus of a salt-sensitive (Basmati 370) and a salt-tolerant (SR-26B) cultivar of rice (Oryza sativa L.) after a NaCl shock. Accumulation of Na+,K+ and/or proline in callus was co relatable and the relative presence of these components in tissues after shock treatment was found to be important factors to support differential regrowth capacities of the shock treated calluses. Presence or retention of K+ in rice callus was a key factor for salt tolerance as it was observed to be positively correlated with growth in both the varieties. The results indicated that K+ was the first candidate to counteract the negative water potential of outside milieu, while proline was probably the last metabolic device that rice calluses opted for when exposed to salt stress.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 64
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Salt tolerance in rice in vitro:: Implication of accumulation of Na+, K+ and proline
    Basu, S
    Gangopadhyay, G
    Mukherjee, BB
    PLANT CELL TISSUE AND ORGAN CULTURE, 2002, 69 (01) : 55 - 64
  • [2] QTLs for Na+ and K+ uptake of the shoots and roots controlling rice salt tolerance
    Lin, HX
    Zhu, MZ
    Yano, M
    Gao, JP
    Liang, ZW
    Su, WA
    Hu, XH
    Ren, ZH
    Chao, DY
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 2004, 108 (02) : 253 - 260
  • [3] QTLs for Na+ and K+ uptake of the shoots and roots controlling rice salt tolerance
    H. X. Lin
    M. Z. Zhu
    M. Yano
    J. P. Gao
    Z. W. Liang
    W. A. Su
    X. H. Hu
    Z. H. Ren
    D. Y. Chao
    Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2004, 108 : 253 - 260
  • [4] Salt tolerance and regulation of Na+, K+, and proline contents in different wild turfgrasses under salt stress
    Tada, Yuichi
    Kochiya, Ryuto
    Toyoizumi, Masayuki
    Takano, Yuka
    PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2023, 40 (04) : 301 - 309
  • [5] Comparative salt tolerance analysis between Arabidopsis thaliana and Thellungiella halophila, with special emphasis on K+/Na+ selectivity and proline accumulation
    Ghars, Mohamed Ali
    Parre, Elodie
    Debez, Ahmed
    Bordenave, Marianne
    Richard, Luc
    Leport, Laurent
    Bouchereau, Alain
    Savoure, Arnould
    Abdelly, Chedly
    JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 165 (06) : 588 - 599
  • [6] OsCaM1-1 Is Responsible for Salt Tolerance by Regulating Na+/K+ Homoeostasis in Rice
    Wei, Siqi
    Chen, Mingjiong
    Wang, Fengyue
    Tu, Yishan
    Xu, Yunfeng
    Fu, Liangbo
    Zeng, Fanrong
    Zhang, Guoping
    Wu, Dezhi
    Shen, Qiufang
    PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 2025, 48 (02): : 1393 - 1408
  • [7] Identification of Rice Accessions Associated with K+/Na+ Ratio and Salt Tolerance Based on Physiological and Molecular Responses
    Reddy, Inja Naga Bheema Lingeswara
    Kim, Sung-Mi
    Kim, Beom-Ki
    Yoon, In-Sun
    Kwon, Taek-Ryoun
    RICE SCIENCE, 2017, 24 (06) : 360 - 364
  • [8] The rice LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL enhances salt tolerance by regulating Na+/K+ homeostasis and ABA signalling
    Li, Chao
    He, Yi-Qin
    Yu, Jie
    Kong, Jia-Rui
    Ruan, Cheng-Cheng
    Yang, Zhen-Kun
    Zhuang, Jun-Jie
    Wang, Yu-Xiao
    Xu, Jian-Hong
    PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 47 (05): : 1625 - 1639
  • [9] S-ABA Enhances Rice Salt Tolerance by Regulating Na+/K+ Balance and Hormone Homeostasis
    Jiang, Wenxin
    Wang, Xi
    Wang, Yaxin
    Du, Youwei
    Zhang, Shuyu
    Zhou, Hang
    Feng, Naijie
    Zheng, Dianfeng
    Ma, Guohui
    Zhao, Liming
    METABOLITES, 2024, 14 (04)
  • [10] Negative correlation between the ratio of K+ to Na+ and proline accumulation in tobacco suspension cells
    Okuma, E
    Soeda, K
    Fukuda, M
    Tada, M
    Murata, Y
    SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT NUTRITION, 2002, 48 (05) : 753 - 757