The Aegean in the Early 7th Millennium BC: Maritime Networks and Colonization

被引:0
作者
B. Horejs
B. Milić
F. Ostmann
U. Thanheiser
B. Weninger
A. Galik
机构
[1] Austrian Academy of Sciences,Institute for Oriental and European Archaeology (OREA)
[2] Veterinary Medicine University Vienna,Institute for Anatomy, Histology and Embryology
[3] University of Vienna,Vienna Institute for Archaeological Science (VIAS)
[4] University of Cologne,Institut für Ur
[5] Istanbul University, und Frühgeschichte
来源
Journal of World Prehistory | 2015年 / 28卷
关键词
Neolithization; Western Anatolia; Aegean; Maritime networks and colonization; Çukuriçi Höyük;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The process of Near Eastern neolithization and its westward expansion from the core zone in the Levant and upper Mesopotamia has been broadly discussed in recent decades, and many models have been developed to describe the spread of early farming in terms of its timing, structure, geography and sociocultural impact. Until now, based on recent intensive investigations in northwestern and western Anatolia, the discussion has mainly centred on the importance of Anatolian inland routes for the westward spread of neolithization. This contribution focuses on the potential impact of east Mediterranean and Aegean maritime networks on the spread of the Neolithic lifestyle to the western edge of the Anatolian subcontinent in the earliest phases of sedentism. Employing the longue durée model and the concept of ‘social memory’, we will discuss the arrival of new groups via established maritime routes. The existence of maritime networks prior to the spread of farming is already indicated by the high mobility of Epipalaeolithic/Mesolithic groups exploring the Aegean and east Mediterranean seas, and reaching, for example, the Cyclades and Cyprus. Successful navigation by these early mobile groups across the open sea is attested by the distribution of Melian obsidian. The potential existence of an additional Pre-Pottery Neolithic (PPN) obsidian network that operated between Cappadocia/Cilicia and Cyprus further hints at the importance of maritime coastal trade. Since both the coastal and the high seas networks were apparently already well established in this early period, we may further assume appropriate knowledge of geographic routes, navigational technology and other aspects of successful seafaring. This Mesolithic/PPN maritime know-how package appears to have been used by later groups, in the early 7th millennium calBC, exploring the centre of the Anatolian Aegean coast, and in time establishing some of the first permanent settlements in that region. In the present paper, we link this background of newcomers to the western edge of Anatolia with new excavation results from Çukuriçi Höyük, which we have analysed in terms of subsistence strategies, materiality, technology and symbolism. Additionally, further detailed studies of nutrition and obsidian procurement shed light on the distinct maritime affinity of the early settlers in our case study, something that, in our view, can hardly be attributed to inland farming societies. We propose a maritime colonization in the 7th millennium via routes from the eastern Mediterranean to the eastern Aegean, based on previously developed sea networks. The pronounced maritime affinity of these farming and herding societies allows us to identify traces of earlier PPN concepts still embedded in the social-cultural memories of the newcomers and incorporated in a new local and regional Neolithic identity.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 330
页数:41
相关论文
共 97 条
[1]  
Astruc L(2003)«Dépôts», «réserves» et «caches» de matériel lithique taillé au Néolithique précéramique au Proche-Orient: Quelle gestion de l’outillage? Paléorient 29 59-78
[2]  
Abbés F(2011)Multi-scale tribological analysis of the technique of manufacture of an obsidian bracelet from Aşıklı Höyük (Aceramic Neolithic, Central Anatolia) Journal of Archaeological Science 38 3415-3424
[3]  
Ibánez Estévez JJ(2008)Zur Herkunft der Obsidianartefakte vom Çukuriçi Höyük Studia Troica 18 251-273
[4]  
González Urquijo JE(2014)A graphical simulation of the 2000-year lag in Neolithic occupation between Central Anatolia and the Aegean basin Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 19 199-230
[5]  
Astruc L(2006)The origins and early development of Mediterranean maritime activity Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology 62 1-33
[6]  
Vargiolu R(2012)The evolution of animal husbandry in Neolithic central-west Anatolia: The zooarchaeological record from Ulucak Höyük (c. 7040–5660 cal. BC, Izmir, Turkey) Anatolian Studies 61 1-19
[7]  
Ben Tkaya M(2011)A true gift of Mother Earth: The use and significance of obsidian at Çatalhöyük Anatolian Studies 88 341-68
[8]  
Balkan-Altı N(2014)The Stélida Naxos Archaeological Project: New data on the Middle Palaeolithic and Mesolithic Cyclades Antiquity 47 41-27
[9]  
Özbaşaran M(1981)Pattern and process in the earliest colonization of the Mediterranean islands Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 22 3-156
[10]  
Zahouani H(2009)Of stamps, loom weights and spindle whorls: Contextual evidence on the function(s) of Neolithic stamps from Ulucak, İzmir, Turkey Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology 25 123-30