A randomized, phase II, three-arm study of two schedules of ixabepilone or paclitaxel plus bevacizumab as first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer

被引:0
作者
Hope S. Rugo
Mario Campone
Dino Amadori
Daniela Aldrighetti
PierFranco Conte
Andrew Wardley
Cristian Villanueva
Michelle Melisko
M. Brent McHenry
David Liu
Francis Lee
Xavier Pivot
机构
[1] UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center,
[2] Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest/René Gauducheau,undefined
[3] IRCCS Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori,undefined
[4] San Raffaele Scientific Institute,undefined
[5] University of Modena and Reggio Emilia,undefined
[6] Christie Hospital,undefined
[7] University Hospital of Besançon,undefined
[8] University of California,undefined
[9] Bristol-Myers Squibb,undefined
[10] Bristol-Myers Squibb,undefined
来源
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | 2013年 / 139卷
关键词
Ixabepilone; Paclitaxel; Bevacizumab; Metastatic breast cancer; Weekly; Every 3 weeks;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this phase II trial was to estimate the objective response rate (ORR) of two different schedules of ixabepilone [weekly or every 3 weeks (Q3W)] combined with bevacizumab, relative to a reference arm of weekly paclitaxel and bevacizumab. Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-normal, chemotherapy-naïve metastatic breast cancer (MBC) were randomized 3:3:2 to ixabepilone 16 mg/m2 weekly plus bevacizumab 10 mg/kg Q2W (Arm A: n = 46); ixabepilone 40 mg/m2 Q3W (reduced to 32 mg/m2 after four cycles of treatment) plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg Q3W (Arm B: n = 45); or paclitaxel 90 mg/m2 weekly plus bevacizumab 10 mg/kg intravenous infusion Q2W (Arm C: n = 32). Of 123 randomized patients, 122 were treated. All were followed for ≥19 months; 5 % of patients remained on study treatment at the time of this analysis. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was more common in Arm B (60 %) than Arms A (16 %) or C (22 %); other adverse events were similar. The investigator-assessed ORR was 48, 71, and 63 % for Arms A, B, and C, respectively. Median progression-free survival (randomized patients) was 9.6 months in Arm A, 11.9 months in Arm B, and 13.5 months in Arm C. In conclusion, ixabepilone Q3W plus bevacizumab has clinical activity as first-line therapy for MBC relative to paclitaxel plus bevacizumab, but with significantly greater risk of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia. In addition, these data suggest that weekly dosing of ixabepilone may be less active than Q3W dosing, but with less neutropenia.
引用
收藏
页码:411 / 419
页数:8
相关论文
共 188 条
[1]  
Marty M(2008)The potential of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in metastatic breast cancer: clinical experience with anti-angiogenic agents, focusing on bevacizumab Eur J Cancer 44 912-920
[2]  
Pivot X(1995)Expression of vascular permeability factor (vascular endothelial growth factor) and its receptors in breast cancer Hum Pathol 26 86-91
[3]  
Brown LF(1997)Expression of the angiogenic factors vascular endothelial cell growth factor, acidic and basic fibroblast growth factor, tumor growth factor beta-1, platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor, placenta growth factor, and pleiotrophin in human primary breast cancer and its relation to angiogenesis Cancer Res 57 963-969
[4]  
Berse B(1997)Prognostic significance of vascular endothelial growth factor protein in node-negative breast carcinoma J Natl Cancer Inst 89 139-147
[5]  
Jackman RW(2001)The expression of vascular endothelial growth factor correlates with mutant p53 and poor prognosis in human breast cancer Cancer Res 61 2256-2260
[6]  
Tognazzi K(1995)Tumor angiogenesis in breast cancer: its importance as a prognostic indicator and the association with vascular endothelial growth factor expression Breast Cancer Res Treat 36 193-204
[7]  
Guidi AJ(2008)VEGF-targeted therapy: mechanisms of anti-tumour activity Nat Rev Cancer 8 579-591
[8]  
Dvorak HF(2010)Phase III study of bevacizumab plus docetaxel compared with placebo plus docetaxel for the first-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer J Clin Oncol 28 3239-3247
[9]  
Senger DR(2007)Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab versus paclitaxel alone for metastatic breast cancer N Engl J Med 357 2666-2676
[10]  
Connolly JL(2011)RIBBON-1: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for first-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer J Clin Oncol 29 1252-1260