Manipulation under anesthesia following total knee arthroplasty: a comprehensive review of literature

被引:33
作者
Kornuijt A. [1 ]
Das D. [2 ]
Sijbesma T. [2 ]
de Vries L. [3 ]
van der Weegen W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Physiotherapy, St. Anna Hospital, Bogardeind 2, Geldrop
[2] Department of Orthopedic Surgery, St. Anna Hospital, Bogardeind 2, Geldrop
[3] Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Westfriesgasthuis Hospital, Maelsonstraat 3, Hoorn
关键词
Effectiveness; Etiology; Manipulation under anesthesia; Rehabilitation; Risk factors; Total knee arthroplasty;
D O I
10.1007/s12306-018-0537-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: The etiology of the stiff knee after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is largely unknown, although excessive scar tissue due to arthrofibrosis is an important reason for a limited range of motion (ROM) after this procedure. Persistent limited ROM after TKA results in poor patient-reported outcomes and is increasingly becoming a more prominent reason for TKA revision surgery. Methods: A narrative review of current literature on manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) after TKA analyzing etiology and risk factors for stiffness after TKA, effectiveness of MUA and what is known about rehabilitation after MUA. Results: Literature describes numerous risk factors for insufficient knee ROM after TKA, but a comprehensive valid risk model is lacking. MUA is an effective treatment option with evidence suggesting better outcomes if performed within the first 3 months after TKA. The wide variety in both the indication and timing for MUA, and the lack of scientific evidence on how to rehabilitate patients after MUA, complicates the interpretation of available literature. This is even more so the case on the reporting of one versus two or more MUAs after TKA. Conclusion: Future comparative trials, preferably with a randomized study design, should be conducted to elude more clear indications for MUA, to give clinical guidance on correct timing for MUA and on how to rehabilitate patients afterward. © 2018, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 230
页数:7
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
Le D.H., Goodman S.B., Maloney W.J., Huddleston J.I., Current modes of failure in TKA: infection, instability, and stiffness predominate, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 472, 7, pp. 2197-2200, (2014)
[2]  
Bong M.R., Di Cesare P.E., Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty, J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 12, 3, pp. 164-171, (2004)
[3]  
Keating E.M., Ritter M.A., Harty L.D., Haas G., Meding J.B., Faris P.M., Et al., Manipulation after total knee arthroplasty, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 89, 2, pp. 282-286, (2007)
[4]  
Yercan H.S., Sugun T.S., Bussiere C., Ait Si Selmi T., Davies A., Neyret P., Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty: prevalence, management and outcomes, Knee, 13, 2, pp. 111-117, (2006)
[5]  
Sharma V., Maheshwari A.V., Tsailas P.G., Ranawat A.S., Ranawat C.S., The results of knee manipulation for stiffness after total knee arthroplasty with or without an intra-articular steroid injection, Indian J Orthop, 42, 3, pp. 314-318, (2008)
[6]  
Husted H., Jorgensen C.C., Gromov K., Troelsen A., Low manipulation prevalence following fast-track total knee arthroplasty, Acta Orthop, 86, 1, pp. 86-91, (2015)
[7]  
Kim J., Nelson C.L., Lotke P.A., Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty. Prevalence of the complication and outcomes of revision, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 86-A, 7, pp. 1479-1484, (2004)
[8]  
Mauerhan D.R., Mokris J.G., Ly A., Kiebzak G.M., Relationship between length of stay and manipulation rate after total knee arthroplasty, J Arthroplasty, 13, 8, pp. 896-900, (1998)
[9]  
Walton N.P., Jahromi I., Dobson P.J., Angel K.R., Lewis P.L., Campbell D.G., Arthrofibrosis following total knee replacement
[10]  
does therapeutic warfarin make a difference?, Knee, 12, 2, pp. 103-106, (2005)