Advance in RANS-LES coupling, a review and an insight on the NLDE approach

被引:0
作者
E. Labourasse
P. Sagaut
机构
[1] CEA Grenoble,Laboratoire de Modélisation et de Développement de Logiciels DEN/DER/SSTH
[2] Laboratoire Modlisation en Mcanique UMPC-CNRS,undefined
来源
Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering | 2004年 / 11卷
关键词
Shear Layer; RANS; AIAA Paper; Suction Side; Spanwise Direction;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this article is twofold. The first purpose is to propose a review of existing RANS-LES methods and is addressed in the first part in a comprehensive way, detailing the advantages and the drawbacks of the different techniques. In a second time, a hybrid RANS-LES approach is presented, which can be interpreted as the most general case of the NLDE approach as defined by Morriset al. A decomposition into three parts of the exact solution of the Navier-Stokes equations is considered: mean flow, resolved fluctuations and unresolved (subgrid) fluctuations. The mean flow is computed using a classical RANS method, while resolved fluctuations are derived from a LES method. Several features on this approach are at first discussed in this paper, that are: the development of a non-zero mean for the resolved fluctuations (also called hereafter details), the computational problems due to the use of different schemes and meshes for the RANS and LES calculations, and the use of a boundary condition suited to the fluctuating part of the field. This approach is then used to simulate the acoustic sources of the flow around the slat of a high-lift system in landing configuration. The mean instabilities of the flow are studied and the resulting acoustic near field is carefully investigated.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 256
页数:57
相关论文
共 125 条
  • [1] Atkins H.(1994)Nonreflective boundary conditions for high-order methods AIAA Journal 32 512-518
  • [2] Casper J.(2096)Two-layer approximate boundary conditions for large-eddy simulations AIAA Journal 34 1111-1119
  • [3] Balaras E.(2004)Interfacing statistical turbulence closures with Large-Eddy Simulation AIAA Journal 42 485-492
  • [4] Benocci C.(2003)Hybrid simulation approach for cavity flows: blending, algorithm, and boundary treatment issues AIAA Journal 41 1463-1480
  • [5] Piomelli U.(1982)Far field boundary conditions for compressible flows J. Comput. Phys. 48 182-199
  • [6] Batten P.(2003)LES, coarse LES, and transient RANS comparisons on the flow across a tube bundle Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 24 470-479
  • [7] Goldberg U.C.(1992)New insights into Large-Eddy Simulation Fluid Dyn. Res. 10 199-228
  • [8] Chakravarthy S.R.(2003)Comparison of DES, RANS and LES for the separated flow around a flat plate at high incidence Int. J. Number. Meth. Fluids 41 357-388
  • [9] Baurle R.A.(2003)Detached-Eddy Simulations of attached and detached boundary layers J. Comput. Fluid Dynamics 17 433-451
  • [10] Tam C.-J.(1997)Numerically nonreflecting boundary and interface conditions for compressible flow and aeroacoustic computations AIAA Journal 35 1126-1133