Prognostic Factors for Return to Work, Sickness Benefits, and Transitions Between These States: A 4-year Follow-up After Work-Related Rehabilitation

被引:0
作者
Irene Øyeflaten
Stein Atle Lie
Camilla M. Ihlebæk
Hege R. Eriksen
机构
[1] The National Centre for Occupational Rehabilitation,Department of Health Promotion and Development
[2] University of Bergen,The Section for Public Health Science, ILP
[3] Uni Health,undefined
[4] Uni Research,undefined
[5] University of Life Sciences,undefined
来源
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | 2014年 / 24卷
关键词
Sick leave; Disability leave; Return to work; Rehabilitation—Vocational; Risk factors;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose The aim of this study was to examine if age, gender, medical diagnosis, occupation, and previous sick leave predicted different probabilities for being at work and for registered sickness benefits, and differences in the transitions between any of these states, for individuals that had participated in an interdisciplinary work-related rehabilitation program. Methods 584 individuals on long-term sickness benefits (mean 9.3 months, SD = 3.4) were followed with official register data over a 4-year period after a rehabilitation program. 66 % were female, and mean age was 44 years (SD = 9.3). The majority had a mental (47 %) or a musculoskeletal (46 %) diagnosis. 7 % had other diagnoses. Proportional hazards regression models were used to analyze prognostic factors for the probability of being on, and the intensity of transitions between, any of the following seven states during follow-up; working, partial sick leave, full sick leave, medical rehabilitation, vocational rehabilitation, partial disability pension (DP), and full DP. Results In a fully adjusted model; women, those with diagnoses other than mental and musculoskeletal, blue-collar workers, and those with previous long-term sick leave, had a lower probability for being at work and a higher probability for full DP during follow-up. DP was also associated with high age. Mental diagnoses gave higher probability for being on full sick leave, but not for transitions to full sick leave. Regression models based on transition intensities showed that risk factors for entering a given state (work or receiving sickness benefits) were slightly different from risk factors for leaving the same state. Conclusions The probabilities for working and for receiving sickness benefits and DP were dependent on gender, diagnoses, type of work and previous history of sick leave, as expected. The use of novel statistical methods to analyze factors predicting transition intensities have improved our understanding of how the processes to and from work, and to and from sickness benefits may differ between groups. Further research is required to understand more about differences in prognosis for return to work after intensive work-related rehabilitation efforts.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 212
页数:13
相关论文
共 156 条
[1]  
Burstrom B(2011)How equitable is vocational rehabilitation in Sweden? A review of evidence on the implementation of a national policy framework Disabil Rehabil 33 453-466
[2]  
Nylen L(2007)Measuring return to work J Occup Rehabil 17 766-781
[3]  
Clayton S(2008)A multi-state model for sick-leave data applied to a randomized control trial study of low back pain Scand J Public Health 36 279-283
[4]  
Whitehead M(2005)Sickness absence with low-back, shoulder, or neck diagnoses: an 11-year follow-up regarding gender differences in sickness absence and disability pension Work 25 115-124
[5]  
Wasiak R(2007)Work resumption after vocational rehabilitation: a follow- up two years after completed rehabilitation Work 28 343-354
[6]  
Young AE(2010)Musculoskeletal disorders as causes of sick leave and disability benefits Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 130 2369-2370
[7]  
Roessler RT(2007)Health complaints and sickness absence in Norway, 1996-2003 Occup Med (Lond) 57 43-49
[8]  
McPherson KM(2003)Diagnosis and duration of sickness absence as predictors for disability pension: results from a three-year, multi-register based and prospective study Scand J Public Health 31 246-254
[9]  
van Poppel MN(2006)Preventing incapacity in people with musculoskeletal disorders Br Med Bull 77–78 55-69
[10]  
Anema JR(2011)NICE guidance on long-term sickness and incapacity Br J Gen Pract 61 118-124