Example-Tracing Tutors: Intelligent Tutor Development for Non-programmers

被引:70
作者
Aleven V. [1 ]
McLaren B.M. [1 ]
Sewall J. [1 ]
Van Velsen M. [1 ]
Popescu O. [1 ]
Demi S. [1 ]
Ringenberg M. [1 ]
Koedinger K.R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Human-Computer Interaction Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh, 15213, PA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Authoring tools; Example-tracing tutors; Intelligent tutoring systems;
D O I
10.1007/s40593-015-0088-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In 2009, we reported on a new Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS) technology, example-tracing tutors, that can be built without programming using the Cognitive Tutor Authoring Tools (CTAT). Creating example-tracing tutors was shown to be 4-8 times as cost-effective as estimates for ITS development from the literature. Since 2009, CTAT and its associated learning management system, the Tutorshop, have been extended and have been used for both research and real-world instruction. As evidence that example-tracing tutors are an effective and mature ITS paradigm, CTAT-built tutors have been used by approximately 44,000 students and account for 40 % of the data sets in DataShop, a large open repository for educational technology data sets. We review 18 example-tracing tutors built since 2009, which have been shown to be effective in helping students learn in real educational settings, often with large pre/post effect sizes. These tutors support a variety of pedagogical approaches, beyond step-based problem solving, including collaborative learning, educational games, and guided invention activities. CTAT and other ITS authoring tools illustrate that non-programmer approaches to building ITS are viable and useful and will likely play a key role in making ITS widespread. © 2016 International Artificial Intelligence in Education Society.
引用
收藏
页码:224 / 269
页数:45
相关论文
共 142 条
[1]  
Adams D.M., McLaren B.M., Durkin K., Mayer R.E., Rittle-Johnson B., Isotani S., Velsen M.V., Using erroneous examples to improve mathematics learning with a web-based tutoring system, Computers in Human Behavior, 36, pp. 401-411, (2014)
[2]  
Adamson D., Dyke G., Jang H., Rose C.P., Towards an agile approach to adapting dynamic collaboration support to student needs, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24, 1, pp. 92-124, (2014)
[3]  
Aleven V., Rule-Based cognitive modeling for intelligent tutoring systems, Studies in Computational Intelligence, pp. 33-62, (2010)
[4]  
Aleven V., A is for Adaptivity, but what is Adaptivity? Re-defining the field of AIED, Proceedings of the Workshops at the 17th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education AIED 2015, 4, (2015)
[5]  
Aleven V., Koedinger K.R., Knowledge component approaches to learner modeling, Design Recommendations for Adaptive Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pp. 165-182, (2013)
[6]  
Aleven V., McLaren B.M., Roll I., Koedinger K.R., Toward meta-cognitive tutoring: A model of help seeking with a cognitive tutor, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 16, pp. 101-128, (2006)
[7]  
Aleven V., McLaren B.M., Sewall J., Koedinger K.R., The Cognitive Tutor Authoring Tools (CTAT): Preliminary evaluation of efficiency gains, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, ITS 2006, pp. 61-70, (2006)
[8]  
Aleven V., Sewall J., McLaren B.M., Koedinger K.R., Rapid authoring of intelligent tutors for real-world and experimental use, Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2006, pp. 847-851, (2006)
[9]  
Aleven V., McLaren B.M., Sewall J., Scaling up programming by demonstration for intelligent tutoring systems development: An open-access web site for middle school mathematics learning, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2, 2, pp. 64-78, (2009)
[10]  
Aleven V., McLaren B.M., Sewall J., Koedinger K.R., A new paradigm for intelligent tutoring systems: Example-tracing tutors, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 19, 2, pp. 105-154, (2009)