Copper filtration in pediatric digital X-ray imaging: Its impact on image quality and dose

被引:41
作者
Brosi P. [1 ]
Stuessi A. [2 ]
Verdun F.R. [3 ]
Vock P. [1 ]
Wolf R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Institute of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern 3010, Freiburgstrasse
[2] Federal Office of Public Health, Bern
[3] University Institute for Radiation Physics, CHUV, UNIL, Lausanne
关键词
Copper; Filtration; Pediatrics; Radiation dose; Radiation protection;
D O I
10.1007/s12194-011-0115-4
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The effect of copper (Cu) filtration on image quality and dose in different digital X-ray systems was investigated. Two computed radiography systems and one digital radiography detector were used. Three different polymethylmethacrylate blocks simulated the pediatric body. The effect of Cu filters of 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 mm thickness on the entrance surface dose (ESD) and the corresponding effective doses (EDs) were measured at tube voltages of 60, 66, and 73 kV. Image quality was evaluated in a contrast-detail phantom with an automated analyzer software. Cu filters of 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 mm thickness decreased the ESD by 25-32%, 32-39%, and 40-44%, respectively, the ranges depending on the respective tube voltages. There was no consistent decline in image quality due to increasing Cu filtration. The estimated ED of anterior-posterior (AP) chest projections was reduced by up to 23%. No relevant reduction in the ED was noted in AP radiographs of the abdomen and pelvis or in posterior-anterior radiographs of the chest. Cu filtration reduces the ESD, but generally does not reduce the effective dose. Cu filters can help protect radiosensitive superficial organs, such as the mammary glands in AP chest projections. © 2011 Japanese Society of Radiological Technology and Japan Society of Medical Physics.
引用
收藏
页码:148 / 155
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, Ann ICRP, 1, 3, (1977)
[2]  
Summary of the Current ICRP Principles for Protection of the Patient in Diagnostic Radiology, (1993)
[3]  
Koedooder K., Venema H.W., Filter materials for dose reduction in screen-film radiography, Physics in Medicine and Biology, 31, 6, pp. 585-600, (1986)
[4]  
Shrimpton P.C., Jones D.G., Wall B.F., The influence of tube filtration and potential on patient dose during x-ray examinations, Phys Med Biol, 33, 10, pp. 1205-1212, (1988)
[5]  
Nicholson R.A., Thornton A., Akpan M., Radiation dose reduction in paediatric fluoroscopy using added filtration, Br J Radiol, 68, 807, pp. 296-300, (1995)
[6]  
Wandl-Vergesslich K.A., Guidelines on Best Practice in the X-Ray Imaging of Children, Eur J Radiol., 33, 1, (2000)
[7]  
Monnin P., Holzer Z., Wolf R., Neitzel U., Vock P., Gudinchet F., Verdun F.R., An image quality comparison of standard and dual-side read CR systems for paediatric radiology, Medical Physics, 33, 2, pp. 411-420, (2006)
[8]  
Tapiovaara M., Lakkisto M., Servomaa A., A PC-based Monte Carlo program for calculating patient doses in medical X-ray examinations, Helsinki: Finnish Centre for Radiation and Nuclear Safety (STUK), (1997)
[9]  
Tapiovaara M., Siiskonen T., PCXMC-A Monte Carlo program for calculating patient doses in medical x-ray examinations, Helsinki: Finnish Centre for Radiation and Nuclear Safety (STUK), (2008)
[10]  
The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, Ann ICRP, pp. 1-332, (2007)