Clinical relevance of diffusion and perfusion magnetic resonance imaging in assessing intra-axial brain tumors

被引:0
作者
N. Rollin
J. Guyotat
N. Streichenberger
J. Honnorat
V.-A. Tran Minh
F. Cotton
机构
[1] Lyon University School of Medicine,Department of Radiology
[2] Lyon University School of Medicine,Department of Neurosurgery
[3] Lyon University School of Medicine,Department of Histopathology
[4] Lyon University School of Medicine,Department of Neurology
来源
Neuroradiology | 2006年 / 48卷
关键词
Brain; Neoplasm; Magnetic resonance imaging; Diffusion; Perfusion;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Advanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging techniques provide physiologic information that complements the anatomic information available from conventional MR imaging. We evaluated the roles of diffusion and perfusion imaging for the assessment of grade and type of histologically proven intraaxial brain tumors. A total of 28 patients with intraaxial brain tumors underwent conventional MR imaging (T2- and T1-weighted sequences after gadobenate dimeglumine injection), diffusion imaging and T2*-weighted echo-planar perfusion imaging. Examinations were performed on 19 patients during initial diagnosis and on nine patients during follow-up therapy. Determinations of relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were performed in the solid parts of each tumor, peritumoral region and contralateral white matter. For gliomas, rCBV values were greater in high-grade than in low-grade tumors (3.87±1.94 versus 1.30±0.42) at the time of initial diagnosis. rCBV values were increased in all recurrent tumors, except in one patient who presented with a combination of recurrent glioblastoma and massive radionecrosis on histology. Low-grade gliomas had low rCBV even in the presence of contrast medium enhancement. Differentiation between high- and low-grade gliomas was not possible using diffusion-weighted images and ADC values alone. In the peritumoral areas of untreated high-grade gliomas and metastases, the mean rCBV values were higher for high-grade gliomas (1.7±0.37) than for metastases (0.54±0.18) while the mean ADC values were higher for metastases. The rCBV values of four lymphomas were low and the signal intensity–time curves revealed a significant increase in signal intensity after the first pass of gadobenate dimeglumine. Diffusion and perfusion imaging, even with relatively short imaging and data processing times, provide important information for lesion characterization.
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 159
页数:9
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]  
Cha S(2002)Intracranial mass lesions: dynamic contrast-enhanced susceptibility-weighted echo-planar perfusion MR imaging Radiology 223 11-29
[2]  
Knopp EA(2002)Cerebral gliomas: prospective comparison of multivoxel 2D chemical-shift imaging proton MR spectroscopy, echoplanar perfusion and diffusion-weighted MRI Neuroradiology 44 656-666
[3]  
Johnson G(2004)Characterization of necrotic meningioma using diffusion MRI, perfusion MRI, and MR spectroscopy: case report and review of the literature Neuroradiology 46 189-193
[4]  
Wetzel SG(2000)Gliomas: WHO and Sainte-Anne Hospital classifications Ann Pathol 20 413-428
[5]  
Litt AW(2003)Glioma grading: sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of perfusion MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging compared with conventional MR imaging AJNR Am J Neuroradiology 24 1989-1998
[6]  
Zagzag D(1999)Glial neoplasms: dynamic contrast-enhanced T2*-weighted MR imaging Radiology 211 791-798
[7]  
Yang D(2004)Primary and secondary brain tumors at MR imaging: bicentric intraindividual crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine Radiology 230 55-64
[8]  
Korogi Y(2004)A comparison of Gd-BOPTA and Gd-DOTA for contrast-enhanced MRI of intracranial tumours Neuroradiology 46 655-665
[9]  
Sugahara T(1972)Tumor angiogenesis: a quantitative method for histologic grading J Natl Cancer Inst 48 347-356
[10]  
Harting I(2002)Using relative cerebral blood flow and volume to evaluate the histopathologic grade of cerebral gliomas: preliminary results AJR Am J Roentgenol 179 783-789