An examination of midwestern US cities’ preparedness for climate change and extreme hazards

被引:0
作者
Qiao Hu
Zhenghong Tang
Martha Shulski
Natalie Umphlett
Tarik Abdel-Monem
Frank E. Uhlarik
机构
[1] University of Nebraska–Lincoln,Community and Regional Planning Program
[2] University of Nebraska–Lincoln,School of Natural Resources
[3] HARH 153B,Public Policy Center
[4] UNL,undefined
[5] University of Nebraska–Lincoln,undefined
来源
Natural Hazards | 2018年 / 94卷
关键词
Climate change; Extreme hazards; Local comprehensive plan; Local hazard mitigation plan; Local emergency operations plan;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The increasing occurrence of extreme weather and climate events raised concerns in regard to hazard mitigation and climate adaptation. Local municipal planning mechanisms play a fundamental role in increasing a community’s capacity toward long-term resiliency. This study employs the content analysis method to evaluate the 95 selected cities located in the US Federal Emergency Management Agency Region VII and examine how these local plans, including local comprehensive plans (CPs), hazard mitigation plans (HMPs), and local emergency operations plans (EOPs), prepare communities for climate change and possible extreme events. Results indicate that local plans delineated multiple resources and diverse strategies to reduce community climatic risks, where HMPs have medium-level preparation, and CPs and EOPs have limited level preparation. Local HMPs lead in mitigating for impacts from potential extreme events, but both local CPs and EOPs are proactively adapted for climatic risks. Common strengths and weaknesses exist between different planning mechanisms. Large variations exist among plans due to varying jurisdictions among cities. However, the plans score similarly overall—higher on strategies and factual base but are short of clear and detailed goals, objectives, and agendas. Finally, despite the diverse vertical and horizontal outreach, there is inadequate integration among local planning mechanisms to share climate hazard information.
引用
收藏
页码:777 / 800
页数:23
相关论文
共 145 条
[1]  
Amundsen H(2010)Overcoming barriers to climate change adaptation—a question of multilevel governance? Environ Plan C Gov Policy 28 276-289
[2]  
Berglund F(2012)Local government response to the impacts of climate change: an evaluation of local climate adaptation plans Landsc Urban Plan 107 127-136
[3]  
Westskog H(2010)Innovation and climate action planning J Am Plann Assoc 76 435-450
[4]  
Baker I(2014)Are we planning effectively for climate change? An evaluation of official community plans in British Columbia J Environ Plan Manage 57 557-587
[5]  
Peterson A(2009)Searching for the good plan: a meta-analysis of plan quality studies CPL Bibliogr 23 227-240
[6]  
Brown G(2012)Planning for resiliency: evaluation of state hazard mitigation plans under the disaster mitigation act Nat Hazards Rev 13 139-149
[7]  
McAlpine C(2014)Impacts of federal and state hazard mitigation policies on local land use policy J Plan Educ Res 34 60-76
[8]  
Bassett E(2015)Evaluation of networks of plans and vulnerability to hazards and climate change: a resilience scorecard J Am Plan As 81 287-302
[9]  
Shandas V(2013)A comprehensive review of climate adaptation in the United States: more than before, but less than needed Mitig Adapt Strat Global Change 18 361-406
[10]  
Baynham M(2008)A spatial analysis of local climate change policy in the United States: risk, stress, and opportunity Landsc Urban Plan 87 33-41