RETRACTED: Studying tourism recovery options under economic constraints: does stakeholder engagement and financial stability matter? (Retracted article. See vol. 31, pg. 58627, 2024)

被引:0
作者
Wang, Xitao [1 ]
Shao, Juan [2 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Business & Technol Coll, Sch Tourism, Hefei 231131, Peoples R China
[2] Anhui Zhongao Inst Technol, Dept Management, Hefei 230041, Peoples R China
关键词
Tourism recovery; Tourism development; Economic considerations; Financial Stability; Stakeholders engagement; AGGREGATE ENERGY-INTENSITY; GREEN FINANCE; RENEWABLE ENERGY; CO2; EMISSIONS; CHINA; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-023-28540-7
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Researchers neglected the relevance of combining tourism with stakeholders' engagement and financial stability for unlocking the economic constraints. For this, current research intended to study the interplay of tourism recovery options under economic constraints with the role of stakeholders' engagement and financial stability. According to our data, China outperforms the other OECD members. The results shown that Russia comes in second with a consistent in tourism recovery, financial stability, and stakeholders' engagement; Indonesia and Turkey, which finished fourth and fifth in the rankings, have good tourism recovery prospects. Mexico and Brazil come in second and third, respectively, with the worst performance and the lowest scores recorded in the survey findings. The overall interplay among the variables was empirically produced based on the findings of this study and is a new inclusive assessment of financial stability and tourism recovery parameters. It is a useful tool for policy development and evaluation. This study also addresses the criticism of load selection at random and accurately depicts the entire scope of fiscal intervention in the economy to prudently enhance tourism recovery at large.
引用
收藏
页码:90675 / 90688
页数:14
相关论文
共 72 条
[11]   Central bank mandates, sustainability objectives and the promotion of green finance [J].
Dikau, Simon ;
Volz, Ulrich .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2021, 184
[12]   Energy intensity and energy conservation potential in China: A regional comparison perspective [J].
Dong, Kangyin ;
Sun, Renjin ;
Hochman, Gal ;
Li, Hui .
ENERGY, 2018, 155 :782-795
[13]   Principles of Sustainable Economic Growth and Development: A Call to Action in a Post-COVID-19 World [J].
Espinosa, Victor I. ;
Alonso Neira, Miguel A. ;
Soto, Jesus Huerta de .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (23)
[14]   Assessing the Opportunities and Challenges of Green Finance in Italy: An Analysis of the Biomass Production Sector [J].
Falcone, Pasquale Marcello ;
Sica, Edgardo .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (02)
[15]   The Limits of Green Finance: A Survey of Literature in the Context of Green Bonds and Green Loans [J].
Gilchrist, David ;
Yu, Jing ;
Zhong, Rui .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (02) :1-12
[16]   Modelling the macroeconomics of a 'closing the green finance gap' scenario for an energy transition [J].
Hafner, Sarah ;
Jones, Aled ;
Anger-Kraavi, Annela ;
Monasterolo, Irene .
ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2021, 40 :536-568
[17]   Closing the green finance gap - A systems perspective [J].
Hafner, Sarah ;
Jones, Aled ;
Anger-Kraavi, Annela ;
Pohl, Jan .
ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2020, 34 :26-60
[18]   Examining the Linkages among Carbon Dioxide Emissions, Electricity Production and Economic Growth in Different Income Levels [J].
Halkos, George E. ;
Gkampoura, Eleni-Christina .
ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (06)
[19]   Applications of Intelligent Model to Analyze the Green Finance for Environmental Development in the Context of Artificial Intelligence [J].
Hemanand, D. ;
Mishra, Nilamadhab ;
Premalatha, G. ;
Mavaluru, Dinesh ;
Vajpayee, Amit ;
Kushwaha, Sumit ;
Sahile, Kibebe .
COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 2022
[20]  
Henama US., 2023, CRISIS MANAGEMENT DE, P57