Pharmacology and adverse effects of new psychoactive substances: synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists

被引:0
作者
Eun Yong Chung
Hye Jin Cha
Hyun Kyu Min
Jaesuk Yun
机构
[1] Chungbuk National University,College of Pharmacy and Medical Research Center
[2] National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation (NIFDS),Pharmacological Research Division, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS)
来源
Archives of Pharmacal Research | 2021年 / 44卷
关键词
New psychoactive substances; Adverse effects; Synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists; Pharmacology; Toxicity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Over the last decade, new psychoactive substances (NPS) have continuously been the focus of the international society since their emergence on the illicit drug market. NPS can be classified into six groups including; synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRAs), stimulants, opioids, dissociatives, sedatives/hypnotics, and classic hallucinogens with psychoactive effects. These are sold as “herbal incense,” “bath salts,” “legal highs,” and “research chemicals”. They can be synthesized easily with slight changes in the chemical moieties of known psychoactive substances. NPS are sold worldwide via on- and off-line markets without proper scientific evaluation regarding their safety or harmfulness. Abuse of NPS poses a serious public health issue, and systematic studies on their adverse effects are lacking. Therefore, it would be meaningful to collect currently available data in order to understand NPS and to establish viable solutions to cope with the various health issues related to them. In this article, we reviewed the general pharmacological characteristics, recent findings, and adverse effects of representative NPS; SCRAs. SCRAs are known as the most commonly abused NPS. Most SCRAs, cannabinoid receptor 1 and cannabinoid receptor 2 agonists, are often associated with severe toxicities, including cardiotoxicity, immunotoxicity, and even death, unlike natural cannabinoid Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol.
引用
收藏
页码:402 / 413
页数:11
相关论文
共 436 条
[1]  
Alon MH(2017)Synthetic cannabinoid induced acute respiratory depression: Case series and literature review Respir Med Case Rep 22 137-141
[2]  
Saint-Fleur MO(2008)Antibacterial cannabinoids from Cannabis sativa: a structure-activity study J Nat Prod 71 1427-1430
[3]  
Appendino G(2007)Marijuana as a trigger of cardiovascular events: speculation or scientific certainty? Int J Cardiol 118 141-144
[4]  
Gibbons S(2016)A new designer drug 5F-ADB activates midbrain dopaminergic neurons but not serotonergic neurons J Toxicol Sci 41 813-816
[5]  
Giana A(2012)Acute cannabis consumption and motor vehicle collision risk: systematic review of observational studies and meta-analysis BMJ 344 e536-820
[6]  
Pagani A(2014)Inhibitory effect of synthetic cannabinoids on CYP1A activity in mouse liver microsomes J Toxicol Sci 39 815-837
[7]  
Grassi G(2009)‘Spice’ and other herbal blends: harmless incense or cannabinoid designer drugs? J Mass Spectrom 44 832-526
[8]  
Stavri M(2013)Structural and functional imaging studies in chronic cannabis users: a systematic review of adolescent and adult findings PLoS ONE 8 e55821-377
[9]  
Smith E(2013)AKI associated with synthetic cannabinoids: a case series Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 8 523-294
[10]  
Rahman MM(2016)The effects of Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol on the dopamine system Nature 539 369-540