Doxastic desire and Attitudinal Monism

被引:0
作者
Douglas I. Campbell
机构
[1] University of Canterbury,Philosophy Department
来源
Synthese | 2018年 / 195卷
关键词
Propositional attitudes; Belief; Desire; Motivational Humeanism; Cognitivism; Internalism;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
How many attitudes must be posited at the level of reductive bedrock in order to reductively explain all the rest? Motivational Humeans hold that at least two attitudes are indispensable, belief and desire. Desire-As-Belief theorists beg to differ. They hold that the belief attitude can do the all the work the desire attitude is supposed to do, because desires are in fact nothing but beliefs of a certain kind. If this is correct it has major implications both for the philosophy of mind, with regards the problem of naturalizing the propositional attitudes, and for metaethics, with regards Michael Smith’s ‘moral problem’. This paper defends a version of Desire-As-Belief, and shows that it is immune to several major objections commonly levelled against such theories.
引用
收藏
页码:1139 / 1161
页数:22
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Bromwich D(2010)Clearing conceptual space for cognitivist motivational internalism Philosophical Studies 148 343-367
[2]  
Daskal S(2010)Absolute value as belief Philosophical Studies 148 221-229
[3]  
Frankfurt HG(1971)Freedom of the will and the concept of a person Journal of Philosophy 68 5-20
[4]  
Franz VH(2003)Grasp effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion: Obstacle avoidance is not the explanation Experimental Brain Research 149 470-477
[5]  
Bulthoff HH(2008)Alief and belief Journal of Philosophy 105 634-663
[6]  
Fahle M(2008)Alief in action (and reaction) Mind and Language 23 552-585
[7]  
Gendler TS(1998)Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74 1464-1480
[8]  
Gendler TS(1987)Wanting as believing Canadian Journal of Philosophy 17 49-62
[9]  
Greenwald AG(1992)Direction of fit Mind 101 59-83
[10]  
McGhee DE(2012)Moral motivation, moral phenomenology, and the alief/belief distinction Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 469-486