Green Innovation and Economic Growth in a North–South Model

被引:0
作者
Jan Witajewski-Baltvilks
Carolyn Fischer
机构
[1] University of Warsaw,Faculty of Economic Sciences
[2] The World Bank,Development Economics Research Group
[3] Institute for Structural Research,undefined
来源
Environmental and Resource Economics | 2023年 / 85卷
关键词
Directed technological change; Green growth; Endogenous growth model; Cross-country spillovers; Unilateral climate policy; Green R&D subsidies; O33; O41; O44; Q55; Q56;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
If one region of the world switches its research effort from dirty to clean technologies, will other regions follow? To investigate this question, this paper builds a North–South model that combines insights from directed technological change and quality-ladder endogenous growth models with business-stealing innovations. While North represents the region with climate ambitions, both regions have researchers choosing between clean and dirty applications, and the resulting technologies are traded. Three main results emerge: (1) In the long run, if the North’s research and development (R&D) sector is sufficiently large, researchers in South will follow the switch from dirty to clean R&D made by researchers in North, motivated by the growing value of clean markets. (2) If the two regions direct research effort toward different sectors and the outputs of the two sectors are gross substitutes, then the long-run growth rates in both regions will be lower than if the global research effort were invested in one sector. (3) If the North’s government induces its researchers to switch to clean R&D through clean technology subsidies, the welfare-maximising choice for South is to ensure that all of its researchers switch too, unless the social discount rate is high. The last result is true even if the South’s R&D sector is large.
引用
收藏
页码:615 / 648
页数:33
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Acemoglu D(2012)The environment and directed technical change Am Econ Rev Am Econ Assoc 102 131-66
  • [2] Aghion P(2014)The environment and directed technical change in a North–South model Oxford Rev Econ Policy 30 513-530
  • [3] Bursztyn L(1992)A model of growth through creative destruction Econom Econom Soc 60 323-51
  • [4] Hémous D(2016)Carbon taxes, path dependency and directed technical change: evidence from the auto industry J Polit Econ 124 1-51
  • [5] Acemoglu D(2014)Fueling growth when oil peaks: directed technological change and the limits to efficiency Eur Econ Rev 69 18-39
  • [6] Aghion P(2022)Potential impacts and challenges of border carbon adjustments Nat Clim Change 12 22-29
  • [7] Hémous D(1992)The international dimension of environmental policy Eur Econ Rev 36 379-387
  • [8] Aghion P(2011)Invention and transfer of climate change–mitigation technologies: a global analysis. Rev Environ Econ Policy 5 109-130
  • [9] Howitt P(2013)Environmental macroeconomics: environmental policy, business cycles, and directed technical change Annu Rev Resour Econ Annu Rev 5 197-210
  • [10] Aghion P(2018)Climate policy and innovation: a quantitative macroeconomic analysis Am Econ J Macroecon 10 90-118