Safety and efficacy of cerebral embolic protection devices in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis of in-hospital outcomes

被引:0
作者
Junichi Shimamura
Toshiki Kuno
Aaqib Malik
Yujiro Yokoyama
Rahul Gupta
Hasan Ahmad
Alexandros Briasoulis
机构
[1] Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre,Division of Cardiac Surgery
[2] Albert Einstein Medical College,Department of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center
[3] Westchester Medical Center and New York Medical College,Department of Cardiology
[4] Easton Hospital,Department of Surgery
[5] Lehigh Valley Heart Institute,Department of Cardiology
[6] Lehigh Valley Health Network,Division of Cardiology
[7] Westchester Medical Center,Section of Heart Failure and Transplant, Division of Cardiovascular Diseases
[8] University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics,undefined
来源
Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics | 2022年 / 37卷
关键词
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement; Embolic protection device; Stroke;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The evidence regarding the impact of cerebral embolic protection devices (EPDs) on outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is limited. The objective of this study was to evaluate in-hospital outcomes with the use of cerebral EPDs in TAVR. We performed a comprehensive EMBASE and PUBMED search to investigate randomized control studies or propensity score-matched retrospective studies which assessed patients undergoing TAVR with or without EPD up to April 2021. Endpoints of interest were in-hospital mortality, stroke, acute kidney injury, pacemaker implantation, major bleeding, vascular complication, length of stay. Ten studies involving 173,002 patients with EPD (n = 16,898, 9.8%) and those without (n = 156,104, 90.2%) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The use of EPD was associated with significantly lower risk of in-hospital stroke (odds ratio [95% confidential interval]: 0.64 [0.46; 0.89]), but similar rate of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [95% confidential interval]: 0.75 [0.54; 1.05]). No differences were observed in acute kidney injury, pacemaker implantation, major bleeding, vascular complication, length of stay. EPD during TAVR was associated with lower in-hospital stroke but did not affect procedural complications and length of stay.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 557
页数:8
相关论文
共 138 条
[1]  
Gleason TG(2018)5-Year outcomes of self-expanding transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients J Am Coll Cardiol 72 2687-2696
[2]  
Reardon MJ(2015)5-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared with standard treatment for patients with inoperable aortic stenosis (PARTNER 1): a randomised controlled trial Lancet 385 2485-2491
[3]  
Popma JJ(2021)Outcomes 2 years after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients at low surgical risk J Am Coll Cardiol 77 1149-1161
[4]  
Deeb GM(2015)5-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement or surgical aortic valve replacement for high surgical risk patients with aortic stenosis (PARTNER 1): a randomised controlled trial Lancet 385 2477-2484
[5]  
Yakubov SJ(2020)Five-year outcomes of transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement N Engl J Med 382 799-809
[6]  
Lee JS(2021)Meta-analysis of usefulness of cerebral embolic protection during transcatheter aortic valve implantation Am J Cardiol 146 69-73
[7]  
Kapadia SR(2017)Cerebral embolic protection devices during transcatheter aortic valve implantation: systematic review and meta-analysis Stroke 48 1306-1315
[8]  
Leon MB(2018)Cerebral protection during transcatheter aortic valve implantation: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis J Am Heart Assoc 339 b2700-414
[9]  
Makkar RR(2021)Cerebral embolic protection and outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement: results from the TVT registry Circulation 66 408-23
[10]  
Tuzcu EM(2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration BMJ 343 d5928-784