Evaluation of the microbiological safety, quality changes, and genotoxicity of chicken breast treated with flexible thin-layer dielectric barrier discharge plasma

被引:0
作者
Haelim Lee
Hae In Yong
Hyun-Joo Kim
Wonho Choe
Suk Jae Yoo
Eun Jin Jang
Cheorun Jo
机构
[1] Seoul National University,Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Center for Food and Bioconvergence, and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Science
[2] National Institute of Crop Science,Crop Post
[3] RDA,harvest Technology Division, Department of Central Area Crop Science
[4] Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology,Department of Physics
[5] National Fusion Research Institute,Plasma Technology Research Center
[6] Yeungnam University,Department of Food and Nutrition
来源
Food Science and Biotechnology | 2016年 / 25卷
关键词
chicken breast; plasma; quality; safety; genotoxicity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The microbiological safety, quality changes, and genotoxicity of chicken breasts treated with flexible thin-layer dielectric barrier discharge (FTDBD) plasma inside a sealed package were investigated. Following 10 min plasma treatment, the numbers of total aerobic bacteria, Listeria monocytogenes, Escherichia coli, and Salmonella Typhimurium were reduced by 3.36, 2.14, 2.73, and 2.71 Log CFU/g, respectively. Color L* and b* values increased whereas a* value decreased following plasma treatment with increasing exposure duration. Lipid oxidation was unaffected by plasma treatment. In sensory evaluation, flavor decreased and off-flavor increased with extended plasma exposure time, however, these changes had no effect on acceptability. Increased cohesiveness was the only texture profile analysis parameter that changed following plasma treatment. No genotoxicity was detected in plasma-treated chicken breast using the Salmonella mutagenicity assay. Therefore, FTDBD plasma is applicable since it is able to improve microbiological safety with minimal changes in sensory properties of the chicken breast.
引用
收藏
页码:1189 / 1195
页数:6
相关论文
共 171 条
[1]  
Scallan E(2011)Foodborne illness acquired in the United States-major pathogens Emerg. Infect. Dis. 17 7-15
[2]  
Hoekstra RM(2001)Prevalence of Appl. Environ. Microb. 67 5431-5436
[3]  
Angulo FJ(2011) spp., Food Microbiol. 28 1293-1300
[4]  
Tauxe RV(2004), and Int. J. Food. Microbiol. 97 23-29
[5]  
Widdowson M-A(2015) in retail chicken, turkey, pork, and beef from the Greater Washington, D.C., area Nitric Oxide 44 52-60
[6]  
Roy SL(2015)Cold atmospheric gas plasma disinfection of chicken meat and chicken skin contaminated with Food Microbiol. 46 51-57
[7]  
Jones JL(2013)Antimicrobial resistance profile of five major food-borne pathogens isolated from beef, pork and poultry Curr. Appl. Phys. 13 1420-1425
[8]  
Griffin PM(2011)The topical use of non-thermal dielectric barrier discharge (DBD): Nitric oxide related effects on human skin Food Microbiol. 28 9-13
[9]  
Zhao C(2014)Flexible thin-layer dielectric barrier discharge plasma treatment of pork butt and beef loin: Effects on pathogen inactivation and meat-quality attributes Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 11 652-657
[10]  
Ge B(2009)Effects of dielectric barrier discharge plasma on pathogen inactivation and the physicochemical and sensory characteristics of pork loin New J. Phys. 11 115020-490