Assessing multifunctional innovation adoption via an integrative model

被引:0
作者
Maria Sääksjärvi
Saeed Samiee
机构
[1] Delft University of Technology,Collins College of Business
[2] The University of Tulsa,undefined
来源
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science | 2011年 / 39卷
关键词
Motivational resources; Multifunctional products; Innovation adoption; Integrative model;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study proposes and tests an integrative model that incorporates the mental resources framework (MOA: motivation, opportunity, and ability) alongside traditional innovation adoption predictors for assessing the adoption of dual-functionality innovations (DFI), a special case of multifunctional innovations (MFI). The multifunctional nature of an increasing number of new products demands the use of mental resources in evaluating new offers, as the comprehension of MFIs is more demanding (i.e., requires more mental resources) than single-functionality (SF) products. The proposed model also recognizes the role of MFI categorization as a critical link in the process, because an MFI, and within the context of our study a DFI, helps consumers achieve multiple goals if they realize its dual functionality. Our model demonstrates that mental resources play a significant role in consumers’ adoption decisions and should be included in studies of MFI adoption. Further, our integrative model offers a significant improvement over rival alternatives that use only traditional innovation adoption predictors. Thus, the model offers a new approach for estimating MFI adoption with a superior predictive power and facilitates the development of appropriate marketing strategies for such products.
引用
收藏
页码:717 / 735
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Innovation development and adoption in small construction firms in Ghana [J].
Dansoh A. ;
Oteng D. ;
Frimpong S. .
Construction Innovation, 2018, 17 (04) :511-535
[32]   Factors for innovation adoption by ports: a systematic literature review [J].
Sooprayen, Krishna ;
van de Kaa, Geerten ;
Pruyn, Jeroen F. J. .
JOURNAL OF OCEAN ENGINEERING AND MARINE ENERGY, 2024, 10 (04) :953-962
[33]   CROSSING THE CHASM: From Adoption to Diffusion of a Telehealth Innovation [J].
Cho, Sunyoung ;
Mathiassen, Lars ;
Gallivan, Michael .
OPEN IT-BASED INNOVATION: MOVING TOWARDS COOPERATIVE IT TRANSFER AND KNOWLEDGE DIFFUSION, 2008, 287 :361-+
[34]   The role of transformational leadership and innovation adoption in restaurant performance [J].
dos Anjos, Sara Joana Gadotti ;
Kuhn, Vitor Roslindo .
TOURISM & MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2024, 20 (01) :49-64
[35]   Organisational active learning: implications for innovation adoption and implementation [J].
Choi, Jin Nam .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION AND LEARNING, 2006, 3 (02) :198-213
[36]   A Systemic View of Innovation Adoption in the Australian Beef Industry [J].
Sun, Daowei ;
Hyland, Paul ;
Bosch, Ockie .
SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 2015, 32 (06) :646-657
[37]   Innovation adoption by forward-looking social learners [J].
Frick, Mira ;
Ishii, Yuhta .
THEORETICAL ECONOMICS, 2024, 19 (04) :1505-1541
[38]   Appropriate Sets of Criteria for Innovation Adoption of IS Security in Organizations [J].
Kosasi, Sandy ;
Vedyanto ;
Yuliani, I. Dewa Ayu Eka .
2018 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, COMPUTER SCIENCE AND INFORMATICS (EECSI 2018), 2018, :608-613
[39]   Exploring the Relationships Between Creativity, Innovativeness and Innovation Adoption [J].
Shiu, Eric .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND INNOVATION, 2009, :431-439
[40]   Using Returns, Risks and Learning to Understand Innovation Adoption [J].
Jackson, Thomas ;
Malcolm, Bill .
AUSTRALASIAN AGRIBUSINESS REVIEW, 2018, 26 :32-47