Systematic development of a set of implementation strategies for transitional care innovations in long-term care

被引:1
作者
Fakha A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
de Boer B. [1 ,2 ]
Hamers J.P. [1 ,2 ]
Verbeek H. [1 ,2 ]
van Achterberg T. [3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Health Services Research, Maastricht University, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht
[2] Living Lab in Ageing and Long-Term Care, Maastricht
[3] KU Leuven, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, Leuven
来源
Implementation Science Communications | / 4卷 / 1期
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Factors; Implementation Mapping; Implementation strategy; Innovation; Intervention; Long-term care; Older persons; Transitional care;
D O I
10.1186/s43058-023-00487-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Numerous transitional care innovations (TCIs) are being developed and implemented to optimize care continuity for older persons when transferring between multiple care settings, help meet their care needs, and ultimately improve their quality of life. Although the implementation of TCIs is influenced by contextual factors, the use of effective implementation strategies is largely lacking. Thus, to improve the implementation of TCIs targeting older persons receiving long-term care services, we systematically developed a set of viable strategies selected to address the influencing factors. Methods: As part of the TRANS-SENIOR research network, a stepwise approach following Implementation Mapping (steps 1 to 3) was applied to select implementation strategies. Building on the findings of previous studies, existing TCIs and factors influencing their implementation were identified. A combination of four taxonomies and overviews of change methods as well as relevant evidence on their effectiveness were used to select the implementation strategies targeting each of the relevant factors. Subsequently, individual consultations with scientific experts were performed for further validation of the process of mapping strategies to implementation factors and for capturing alternative ideas on relevant implementation strategies. Results: Twenty TCIs were identified and 12 influencing factors (mapped to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research) were designated as priority factors to be addressed with implementation strategies. A total of 40 strategies were selected. The majority of these target factors at the organizational level, e.g., by using structural redesign, public commitment, changing staffing models, conducting local consensus discussions, and organizational diagnosis and feedback. Strategies at the level of individuals included active learning, belief selection, and guided practice. Each strategy was operationalized into practical applications. Conclusions: This project developed a set of theory and evidence-based implementation strategies to address the influencing factors, along further tailoring for each context, and enhance the implementation of TCIs in daily practice settings. Such work is critical to advance the use of implementation science methods to implement innovations in long-term care successfully. © 2023, BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Tracking strategies in long term care
    Wong, Desmond
    Hiew, Yee Lin
    2018 3RD TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION MANAGEMENT AND ENGINEERING SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE (TIMES-ICON), 2018,
  • [42] The Effectiveness of Biographical Approaches in Long-Term Care: A Systematic Review
    Menn, Lara
    Corsten, Sabine
    Lauer, Norina
    Wallace, Sarah J.
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2020, 60 (04) : E309 - E328
  • [43] Systematic review of long term follow-up and transitional care in adolescents and adults with esophageal atresia-why is transitional care mandatory?
    Brooks, G.
    Gazzaneo, M.
    Bertozzi, M.
    Riccipetitoni, G.
    Raffaele, A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2023, 182 (05) : 2057 - 2066
  • [44] Fracture risk assessment in long-term care:a survey of long-term care physicians
    Michelle Wall
    Lynne Lohfeld
    Lora Giangregorio
    George Ioannidis
    Courtney C Kennedy
    Andrea Moser
    Alexandra Papaioannou
    Suzanne N Morin
    BMC Geriatrics, 13
  • [45] Implementation of the Better Jobs Better Care demonstration: Lessons for long-term care workforce initiatives
    Kemper, Peter
    Brannon, Diane
    Barry, Teta
    Stott, Amy
    Heier, Brigitt
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2008, 48 : 26 - 35
  • [46] Long-term care in Italy
    Dominguez, L. J.
    Barbagallo, M.
    GIORNALE DI GERONTOLOGIA, 2012, 60 (05) : 251 - 254
  • [47] Dilemmas of long-term care
    Huch, MH
    NURSING SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2002, 15 (03) : 251 - 252
  • [48] Cancer in Long-Term Care
    Korc-Grodzicki, Beatriz
    Wallace, James A.
    Rodin, Miriam B.
    Bernacki, Rachelle E.
    CLINICS IN GERIATRIC MEDICINE, 2011, 27 (02) : 301 - +
  • [49] Long-Term Care and Humanbecoming
    Karnick, Paula M.
    NURSING SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2015, 28 (04) : 279 - 279
  • [50] Technology for Long-Term Care
    Tak, Sunghee H.
    Benefield, Lazelle E.
    Mahoney, Diane Feeney
    RESEARCH IN GERONTOLOGICAL NURSING, 2010, 3 (01) : 61 - 72