Systematic development of a set of implementation strategies for transitional care innovations in long-term care

被引:1
作者
Fakha A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
de Boer B. [1 ,2 ]
Hamers J.P. [1 ,2 ]
Verbeek H. [1 ,2 ]
van Achterberg T. [3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Health Services Research, Maastricht University, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht
[2] Living Lab in Ageing and Long-Term Care, Maastricht
[3] KU Leuven, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, Leuven
来源
Implementation Science Communications | / 4卷 / 1期
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Factors; Implementation Mapping; Implementation strategy; Innovation; Intervention; Long-term care; Older persons; Transitional care;
D O I
10.1186/s43058-023-00487-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Numerous transitional care innovations (TCIs) are being developed and implemented to optimize care continuity for older persons when transferring between multiple care settings, help meet their care needs, and ultimately improve their quality of life. Although the implementation of TCIs is influenced by contextual factors, the use of effective implementation strategies is largely lacking. Thus, to improve the implementation of TCIs targeting older persons receiving long-term care services, we systematically developed a set of viable strategies selected to address the influencing factors. Methods: As part of the TRANS-SENIOR research network, a stepwise approach following Implementation Mapping (steps 1 to 3) was applied to select implementation strategies. Building on the findings of previous studies, existing TCIs and factors influencing their implementation were identified. A combination of four taxonomies and overviews of change methods as well as relevant evidence on their effectiveness were used to select the implementation strategies targeting each of the relevant factors. Subsequently, individual consultations with scientific experts were performed for further validation of the process of mapping strategies to implementation factors and for capturing alternative ideas on relevant implementation strategies. Results: Twenty TCIs were identified and 12 influencing factors (mapped to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research) were designated as priority factors to be addressed with implementation strategies. A total of 40 strategies were selected. The majority of these target factors at the organizational level, e.g., by using structural redesign, public commitment, changing staffing models, conducting local consensus discussions, and organizational diagnosis and feedback. Strategies at the level of individuals included active learning, belief selection, and guided practice. Each strategy was operationalized into practical applications. Conclusions: This project developed a set of theory and evidence-based implementation strategies to address the influencing factors, along further tailoring for each context, and enhance the implementation of TCIs in daily practice settings. Such work is critical to advance the use of implementation science methods to implement innovations in long-term care successfully. © 2023, BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Innovations in long-term care: The case of old people's homes in Slovenia
    Mali, Jana
    REVIJA ZA SOCIJALNU POLITIKU, 2019, 26 (02): : 207 - 225
  • [32] Access to Long-Term Care for Minority Populations: A Systematic Review
    Scott, Mary M.
    Mayhew, Alain
    Jeong, Ahwon
    Shaver, Nicole
    Lapenskie, Julie
    Hsu, Amy T.
    Tanjong-Ghogomu, Elizabeth
    Tanuseputro, Peter
    Huang, Emily
    Welch, Vivian
    CANADIAN JOURNAL ON AGING-LA REVUE CANADIENNE DU VIEILLISSEMENT, 2022, 41 (04): : 577 - 592
  • [33] Components of palliative care interventions addressing the needs of people with dementia living in long-term care: A systematic review
    Kochovska, Slavica
    Garcia, Maja, V
    Bunn, Frances
    Goodman, Claire
    Luckett, Tim
    Parker, Deborah
    Phillips, Jane L.
    Sampson, Elizabeth L.
    van der Steen, Jenny T.
    Agar, Meera R.
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2020, 34 (04) : 454 - 492
  • [34] Long-Term Care Needs of the Elderly in Korea and Elderly Long-Term Care Insurance
    Kim, Suk-Hee
    Kim, Deok Hwan
    Kim, Woong Soo
    SOCIAL WORK IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2010, 25 (02) : 176 - 184
  • [35] Detecting Anxiety in Long-Term Care Residents: A Systematic Review
    Atchison, Kayla
    Shafiq, Samreen
    Ewert, Delaney
    Leung, Alexander A.
    Goodarzi, Zahra
    CANADIAN JOURNAL ON AGING-LA REVUE CANADIENNE DU VIEILLISSEMENT, 2023, 42 (01): : 92 - 101
  • [36] Fracture risk assessment in long-term care: a survey of long-term care physicians
    Wall, Michelle
    Lohfeld, Lynne
    Giangregorio, Lora
    Ioannidis, George
    Kennedy, Courtney C.
    Moser, Andrea
    Papaioannou, Alexandra
    Morin, Suzanne N.
    BMC GERIATRICS, 2013, 13
  • [37] Interprofessional Collaboration in Long-Term Care and Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review
    Doornebosch, Arno J.
    Smaling, Hanneke J. A.
    Achterberg, Wilco P.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2022, 23 (05) : 764 - +
  • [38] On studying ageism in long-term care: a systematic review of the literature
    Sousa de Sao Jose, Jose Manuel
    Filipe Amado, Carla Alexandra
    INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS, 2017, 29 (03) : 373 - 387
  • [39] Suicide risk in long-term care facilities: a systematic review
    Mezuk, Briana
    Rock, Andrew
    Lohman, Matthew C.
    Choi, Moon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 29 (12) : 1198 - 1211
  • [40] Risk Factors for Depression in Long-Term Care: A Systematic Review
    Chau, Rebecca
    Kissane, David W.
    Davison, Tanya E.
    CLINICAL GERONTOLOGIST, 2019, 42 (03) : 224 - 237