Surface crack propagation analysis under residual stress field

被引:0
|
作者
Mochizuki M. [1 ]
Miyazaki K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Manufacturing Science, Osaka University
[2] Mechanical Engineering Research Laboratory, Hitachi, Ltd.
关键词
Butt joints; Comparisons; Crack propagation; Cracking; Defects; Evaluation; Fatigue tests; K1C; Mechanical tests; Plate; Practical investigations; Reference lists; Residual stresses; Strain; Stress distribution; Surfaces; Welded joints;
D O I
10.1007/BF03266522
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Stress intensity factors due to surface crack propagation were analysed by using the influence function method and inherent strain analysis of the residual stress fields caused by welding. The initial residual stress in a plate with a welded butt joint was calculated by using inherent strain analysis, and the redistribution of residual stress and the stress intensity factor due to crack propagation were analysed as changes in the structure's shape. The stress intensity factor was also calculated by using an influence function database. The stress intensity factor in the residual stress fields due to crack propagation obtained by using inherent strain analysis completely agreed with that obtained by using the influence function method. The results of the crack propagation analysis were compared with the experimental results of a fatigue test. It was validated that both the inherent strain analysis and the influence function method were efficient for analysing stress intensity factors in residual stress fields caused by welding.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 45
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Crack-tip residual stresses and crack propagation 00 in cyclically-loaded specimens under different loading modes
    Jägg, S
    Scholtes, B
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR METALLKUNDE, 2005, 96 (07): : 770 - 774
  • [22] Prediction of the crack opening behaviour for the fatigue crack propagating in welding residual stress field
    Park, EJ
    Kim, EJ
    Yoo, SF
    ADVANCES IN NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION, PT 1-3, 2004, 270-273 : 96 - 101
  • [23] Residual stress influence on fatigue crack propagation of CFRP strengthened welded joints
    Jie, Zhiyu
    Wang, Kainan
    Liang, Shidong
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2022, 196
  • [24] Monitoring Fatigue Crack Initiation and Propagation Using Changes in Weld Residual Stress
    Naoki Matsumoto
    Toshiyuki Ishikawa
    International Journal of Steel Structures, 2025, 25 (2) : 581 - 589
  • [25] Crack Arrest Analysis of Components With Compressive Residual Stress
    Xiao, Xuran
    Okorokov, Volodymyr
    Mackenzie, Donald
    FATIGUE & FRACTURE OF ENGINEERING MATERIALS & STRUCTURES, 2025, 48 (03) : 1272 - 1287
  • [26] Numerical analysis of the rail surface crack propagation under rail uplift force: A parametric study on initial crack geometry
    Sung, Deokyong
    Hong, Seongwon
    Lee, Jaeik
    ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS, 2023, 153
  • [27] Crack propagation and damage of rock under uniaxial compression based on global strain field analysis
    Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai
    200092, China
    不详
    200092, China
    不详
    852-8521, Japan
    Yanshilixue Yu Gongcheng Xuebao, 4 (763-769): : 763 - 769
  • [28] Stress distribution and crack propagation of high stress hard rock under excavation unloading-perforation fracturing
    Chen Z.-H.
    Chen Q.-N.
    Li X.-B.
    Wu Q.-H.
    Huang X.-C.
    Zhongguo Youse Jinshu Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals, 2023, 33 (03): : 952 - 968
  • [29] Crack propagation in compressive residual stress fields of crankshafts:: experimental study and numerical simulation
    Gardin, C
    Courtin, S
    Bézine, G
    Bertheaul, D
    Hamouda, HBH
    Computer Methods and Experimental Measurements for Surface Effects and Contact Mechanics VII, 2005, 49 : 231 - 240
  • [30] Propagation behavior of a surface crack occurred at the plate under combined stress state of cyclic bending and static torsion
    Ono Y.
    Li C.
    Bokura M.
    Nihon Kikai Gakkai Ronbunshu, A Hen/Transactions of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Part A, 2010, 76 (768): : 68 - 73