A Comparison of Two Experimental Design Approaches in Applying Conjoint Analysis in Patient-Centered Outcomes ResearchA Randomized Trial

[1] Bridges J(2008)Things are looking up since we started listening to patients: trends in the application of conjoint analysis in health 1982–2007 Patient 1 273-82

[2] Kinter ET(2010)Conjoint analysis applications in health: how are studies being designed and reported? An update on current practice in the published literature between 2005 and 2008 Patient 3 249-56

[3] Kidane L(2003)Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future research reflections Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2 55-64

[4] Marshall D(2012)Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature Health Econ 21 145-72

[5] Bridges J(1994)Combining reveals preference and stated preference methods for valuing environmental amenities J Environ Econ Manage 6 271-92

[6] Hauber AB(2000)Quality assurance and the consumer: a conjoint study Br Food J 101 48-161

[7] Ryan M(2011)A checklist for conjoint analysis applications in health: report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force Value Health 14 403-13

[8] Gerard K(2005)Empirical investigation of experimental design properties of discrete choice experiments in health care Health Econ 14 349-62

[9] de Bekker-Grob EW(2008)Survey-design and analytical strategies for better healthcare stated-choice studies Patient 1 299-307

[10] Ryan M(1996)The importance of utility balance in efficient choice designs J Marketing Res 33 307-17

[1] Bridges J(2008)Things are looking up since we started listening to patients: trends in the application of conjoint analysis in health 1982–2007 Patient 1 273-82

[2] Kinter ET(2010)Conjoint analysis applications in health: how are studies being designed and reported? An update on current practice in the published literature between 2005 and 2008 Patient 3 249-56

[3] Kidane L(2003)Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future research reflections Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2 55-64

[4] Marshall D(2012)Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature Health Econ 21 145-72

[5] Bridges J(1994)Combining reveals preference and stated preference methods for valuing environmental amenities J Environ Econ Manage 6 271-92

[6] Hauber AB(2000)Quality assurance and the consumer: a conjoint study Br Food J 101 48-161

[7] Ryan M(2011)A checklist for conjoint analysis applications in health: report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force Value Health 14 403-13

[8] Gerard K(2005)Empirical investigation of experimental design properties of discrete choice experiments in health care Health Econ 14 349-62

[9] de Bekker-Grob EW(2008)Survey-design and analytical strategies for better healthcare stated-choice studies Patient 1 299-307

[10] Ryan M(1996)The importance of utility balance in efficient choice designs J Marketing Res 33 307-17