De-escalation from ticagrelor to clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Dominick J. Angiolillo
Giuseppe Patti
Kam Tim Chan
Yaling Han
Wei-Chun Huang
Alexey Yakovlev
Dara Paek
Michael del Aguila
Shalini Girotra
Dirk Sibbing
机构
[1] University of Florida,Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology
[2] Chair of Cardiology,Director of Cardiac Catheterization and Interventional Laboratory, Consultant Cardiologist
[3] University of L’Aquila,Department of Cardiology
[4] Queen Elizabeth Hospital,Department of Critical Care Medicine
[5] The General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region,School of Medicine
[6] Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital,Department of Physical Therapy
[7] National Yang-Ming University,Department of Cardiology
[8] Fooyin University,undefined
[9] Almazov National Medical Research Centre,undefined
[10] Doctor Evidence,undefined
[11] Sanofi,undefined
[12] General Medicine and Emerging Markets,undefined
[13] LMU München,undefined
[14] DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research),undefined
[15] Partner Site Munich Heart Alliance,undefined
来源
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis | 2019年 / 48卷
关键词
Acute coronary syndrome; De-escalation; Antiplatelet therapy; Meta-analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
De-escalation from ticagrelor to clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) may occur for a variety of reasons, including side effects (bleeding and non-bleeding) and costs. This study sought to assess the prevalence of de-escalation from ticagrelor to clopidogrel and the occurrence of adverse clinical outcomes following de-escalation. We conducted a systematic review of clinical trials and real-world studies in ACS patients treated with ticagrelor. Real-world data on the prevalence of de-escalation during hospitalization or at discharge, after hospital discharge, and during the whole study period were included for meta-analysis. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and bleeding events occurring after de-escalation were also assessed. A total of 12 studies were eligible for meta-analysis of the prevalence of de-escalation. De-escalation from ticagrelor to clopidogrel therapy occurred with a mean prevalence of 19.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 11.2–28.4%]. De-escalation occurred more frequently in-hospital or at discharge than after hospital discharge (23.7% vs. 15.8%). For assessment of clinical outcomes, a total of six studies were eligible for meta-analysis. Mean rate of MACE for patients with de-escalation was 2.1% (95% CI 1.1–4.1%) and the rate of major bleeding events was 1.3% (95% CI 0.4–4.5%). In conclusion, de-escalation commonly occurs in real-world practice. Although rates of major cardiovascular and bleeding events in this analysis were generally low, the profile of patients suitable for de-escalation, the impact of de-escalation on adverse clinical outcomes and how this is affected by the timing after index ACS warrants further large-scale investigation.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:9
相关论文
共 124 条
[1]  
Levine GN(2016)2016 ACC/AHA guideline focused update on duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines J Am Coll Cardiol 68 1082-1115
[2]  
Bates ER(2017)2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS: the task force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) Eur Heart J 39 213-260
[3]  
Bittl JA(2018)ACC/AHA versus ESC guidelines on dual antiplatelet therapy: JACC guideline comparison J Am Coll Cardiol 72 2915-2931
[4]  
Valgimigli M(2007)Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes N Engl J Med 357 2001-2015
[5]  
Bueno H(2009)Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes N Engl J Med 361 1045-1057
[6]  
Byrne RA(2015)Novel antiplatelet agents in acute coronary syndrome Nat Rev Cardiol 12 30-47
[7]  
Capodanno D(2016)Opportunities for improvement in anti-thrombotic therapy and other strategies for the management of acute coronary syndromes: insights from EPICOR, an international study of current practice patterns Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 5 3-12
[8]  
Alfonso F(2016)Switching of platelet P2Y12 receptor inhibitors in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: review of the literature and practical considerations Am Heart J 176 44-52
[9]  
Levine GN(2017)Guided de-escalation of antiplatelet treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (TROPICAL-ACS): a randomised, open-label, multicentre trial Lancet 390 1747-1757
[10]  
Valgimigli M(2008)Early and late benefits of prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a TRITON-TIMI 38 (TRial to assess improvement in therapeutic outcomes by optimizing platelet InhibitioN with prasugrel-thrombolysis in myocardial infarction) analysis J Am Coll Cardiol 51 2028-2033