Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

被引:11
作者
Jenny J.-Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Centre de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de la Main, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 10 Avenue Baumann, Illkirch-Graffenstaden
关键词
Knee; Minimal invasive; Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty;
D O I
10.1007/s00590-017-2107-5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The exact indication for a unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) remains debated. Minimally invasive techniques have been developed to decrease the surgical trauma related to the prosthesis implantation, and this technique is well fitted to UKA. However, there are concerns about loss of accuracy with minimally invasive techniques. Furthermore, rapid recovery techniques have been developed in order to reduce the length of hospital stay. Again, UKA is well fitted to these new developments of postoperative care. We combine routinely a minimal invasive operative technique with navigation assistance to ensure proper positioning of the implants as well as an optimal ligamentous balance. Instruments have been adapted for use with a typical 6-cm skin incision with little change from the conventional navigated operating technique. A multimodal pain treatment is implemented immediately after the implantation, with special attention to a routine saphenous nerve blockade. Patients are instructed to stand up on the day of surgery with full weight bearing and to mobilize the knee joint without restriction. They may be discharged at least on the day following surgery, and the most favorable patients may be operated in our day-case surgery unit. These conclusions should be confirmed on a larger scale. © 2017, Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.
引用
收藏
页码:793 / 797
页数:4
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Romanowski M.R., Repicci J.A., Minimally invasive unicondylar arthroplasty: eight-year follow-up, J Knee Surg, 15, pp. 17-22, (2002)
  • [2] Tria A.J., Advancements in minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty, Orthopedics, 26, pp. s859-s863, (2003)
  • [3] Jenny J.Y., Ciobanu E., Boeri C., The rationale for navigated minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 463, pp. 58-62, (2007)
  • [4] Berend K.R., Lombardi A.V., Mallory T.H., Adams J.B., Groseth K.L., Early failure of minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is associated with obesity, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 440, pp. 60-66, (2005)
  • [5] Dalury D.F., Dennis D.A., Mini-incision total knee arthroplasty can increase risk of component malalignment, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 440, pp. 77-81, (2005)
  • [6] Hamilton W.G., Collier M.B., Tarabee E., McAuley J.P., Engh C.A., Engh G.A., Incidence and reasons for reoperation after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, J Arthroplasty, 21, pp. 98-107, (2006)
  • [7] Husted H., Fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty: clinical and organizational aspects, Acta Orthop, Suppl 83, 346, pp. 1-39, (2012)
  • [8] Delp S.L., Stulberg S.D., Davies B.L., Picard F., Leitner F., Computer assisted knee replacement, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 354, pp. 49-56, (1998)
  • [9] Cossey A.J., Spriggins A.J., The use of computer-assisted surgical navigation to prevent malalignment in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, J Arthroplasty, 20, pp. 29-34, (2005)
  • [10] Jenny J.Y., Boeri C., Unicompartmental knee prosthesis implantation with a non-image-based navigation system: rationale, technique, case–control comparative study with a conventional instrumented implantation, Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 11, pp. 40-45, (2003)