Differential tolerance of two wheat cultivars to NaCl is related to antioxidant potentialities

被引:0
|
作者
Mamdouh M. Nemat Alla
Gaber M. Abogadallah
Enas G. Badran
Reham M. Nada
机构
[1] Damietta University,Botany Department, Faculty of Science
来源
关键词
Enzymatic antioxidants; Non-enzymatic antioxidants; Salinity; Tolerance; Wheat;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Treatment of nine-day-old seedlings of two wheat cultivars (Misr1 and Sakha93) for 15 days by NaCl at 75, 150, and 225 mM led to significant decreases in fresh and dry weights of only Sakha93, although the growth parameters of both cultivars were mostly similar under normal conditions. All the concentrations led to significant accumulations of MDA and H2O2 in Sakha93 while in Misr1, the increases were detected only with 150 and 225 mM. On the contrary, reducing power was significantly diminished in Sakha93 by all concentrations of NaCl as well as in Misr1 by 225 mM. On the other hand, the phenolic contents were highly elevated in Sakha93 by all concentrations of NaCl; however, only 225 mM caused a significant increase. Also, all concentrations of NaCl decreased both protein and GSH in Sakha93; nonetheless, all concentrations had no significant effects except for the decreases in protein by 225 mM. The activities of the enzymatic antioxidants, CAT, POD, GST, and GR, in spite of being slightly increased in Misr1 by low NaCl concentrations, were significantly inhibited in Sakha93 by all concentrations. These results suggest that Misr1 is less sensitive to NaCl than Sakha93. The accumulations of MDA and H2O2 in Sakha93 concomitant with the decreases in GSH reveal that scavenging of ROS is less efficient in the more sensitive than the less sensitive cultivar which seemed to tolerate NaCl maybe because of the efficiency of the inducible potential antioxidants.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 215
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Differential tolerance of two wheat cultivars to NaCl is related to antioxidant potentialities
    Alla, Mamdouh M. Nemat
    Abogadallah, Gaber M.
    Badran, Enas G.
    Nada, Reham M.
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2014, 37 (03) : 207 - 215
  • [2] SALINITY TOLERANCE COMPONENTS AND RESPONSE OF IRANIAN WHEAT CULTIVARS TO NaCl STRESS
    Anagholi, Amin
    Galeshi, Sarollah
    Soltani, Afshin
    IIOAB JOURNAL, 2016, 7 : 344 - 354
  • [3] Assessment of Tolerance to NaCl Salinity of Fourteen Wheat and Broad Bean Cultivars
    Radi, Abeer A.
    Farghly, Fatma A.
    Hamada, Afaf M.
    PHYTON-ANNALES REI BOTANICAE, 2012, 52 (01) : 145 - 162
  • [4] Differential activation of genes related to aluminium tolerance in two contrasting rice cultivars
    Rosello, Maite
    Poschenrieder, Charlotte
    Gunse, Benet
    Barcelo, Juan
    Llugany, Merce
    JOURNAL OF INORGANIC BIOCHEMISTRY, 2015, 152 : 160 - 166
  • [5] ALUMINUM TOLERANCE OF WHEAT CULTIVARS RELATED TO REGION OF ORIGIN
    FOY, CD
    LAFEVER, HN
    SCHWARTZ, JW
    FLEMING, AL
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1974, 66 (06) : 751 - 758
  • [6] Comparative Analysis of Antioxidant System and Salt-Stress Tolerance in Two Hibiscus Cultivars Exposed to NaCl Toxicity
    Lu, Wenjing
    Zhao, Ye
    Liu, Jinying
    Zhou, Bowen
    Wei, Guoqing
    Ni, Ruiqiang
    Zhang, Shuyong
    Guo, Jing
    PLANTS-BASEL, 2023, 12 (07):
  • [7] Effect of photooxidative stress induced by paraquat in two wheat cultivars with differential tolerance to water stress
    Lascano, HR
    Melchiorre, MN
    Luna, CM
    Trippi, VS
    PLANT SCIENCE, 2003, 164 (05) : 841 - 848
  • [8] DIFFERENTIAL TOLERANCE OF WHEAT (TRITICUM-AESTIVUM) CULTIVARS TO METRIBUZIN
    RUNYAN, TJ
    MCNEIL, WK
    PEEPER, TF
    WEED SCIENCE, 1982, 30 (01) : 94 - 97
  • [9] Effects of salicylic acid and salinity on apoplastic antioxidant enzymes in two wheat cultivars differing in salt tolerance
    Mutlu, S.
    Atici, Oe
    Nalbantoglu, B.
    BIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 2009, 53 (02) : 334 - 338
  • [10] ABA improvement of antioxidant metabolism under water stress in two wheat cultivars contrasting in drought tolerance
    Kaur L.
    Gupta A.K.
    Zhawar V.K.
    Indian Journal of Plant Physiology, 2014, 19 (2): : 189 - 196